“The body doesn’t lie. Neither does the voice or speech pattern.” – Dr. Lillian Glass
The interview of V. Stiviano was very revealing body language, voice, and speech content wise. She says many things which contradict herself as you will see in this blog. She even incriminates herself and Donald as she says she is being paid off the books. Her slow and labored speech, eye shifting, lip licking and shoulder shrugging show that she is being manipulative in answering Barbara Walter’s question’s however the truth leaks out.
As V. Stiviano the alleged mistress of Donald Sterling talks about how lonely, alone, confused Donald Sterling is and how she actually just came from seeing him she looks to the side. When Barbara says that she was with him so Donald is not alone, Stiviano looks to the side to think about what she says and says she is with him “to help him”. Then she contradicts herself and says she is urging him “to come to his own rescue,” which makes absolutely no sense in light of what she said previously.
She shifts her eyes back and forth a lot and speaks in a very slow and measured well thought out and monotnne sound devoid of emotion as she says ” even with her ‘help’ he feels alone.”
We see an incredible amount of signals of deception when she says that Donald is traumatized by the things he says. She does shoulder shrugging and looks to the right and left and speaks very very slowly. This is not true in my view. Donald is just traumatized the tape got out. He is not traumatized by what he said and she knows it. Otherwise he would have issued an immediate apology. So in this case Stiviano is lying in my view.
She is asked by Barbara if Donald Sterling should apologize. She shakes her head No as she says “absolutely.” To me it means that she is enjoying this fiasco and his apology would take the focus off of her so “No” she doesn’t think he should apologize is what her body language reveals.
The fact that she claimed earlier in press days ago that she had not spoken to or seen Donald Sterling since the incident and now, as Barbara Walters reported, she has just come from seeing him, says to me that she was most rehearsing what she would say publicly and perhaps keeping their story of not being lovers in sync. When Barbara asked her if Donald will apologize. She looks down and slowly says in a monotone voice “Only God knows”. The fact that she looks down means she is gathering her thoughts in terms of what she wanted to say.
Barabara directly asks her is she is in love with Donald Sterling. V Stiviano gives a genuine smile with her cheeks raised and eyes squinted. This is the first time she lights up. To most this is shocking. If she is half Black as she says she is and half Mexican as she says she is and Donald spoke that way about her ethnicity, how could she love him? She may love the 1.8 million dollar home, the Ferrari and Bentlys he gave her. But to love someone who hates part of the the essence of who you are (Black) is very unusual and hypocritical.
Brabara asks her what her relationship is to Donald Sterling. She laughs and smiles and says she is is right hand “man”. The fact that she would use the term “man” is interesting since many throughout the internet have remarked how much she looks like a man going to through a sex transition- a treansexual. Is V. Stiviano calling herself a “man” indicating she may be leaking out the truth about her sexuality or is it a subconscious shout out to people over the internet calling her out on looking like a man?
She also says she is “Mr. Sterling’s everything” (which in many people’s view would include lover) as she shrugs her shoulders when she says “confidant” “his best friend” (with friends like her one does not need enemies), “his silly rabbit” where she says she does things around him that seem silly. As she says this we see a lot of discomfort in her body language as she fidgets around. Can this discomfort be due to her perhaps omitting another noun to describe what she is to Sterling- “lover?” After all she describes herself as a “lover” on her instagram.
Does that moniker apply to her relationship with Donald? We then see her swallow hard (an indicator of deception) in this context where she says many people can’t understand her relationshIp as she looks down and from side to side as though she is searching for the correct spin. “She then shrugs her shoulders and says” I’m his everything”. Well, Ms. Stiviano, “everything: includes “lover.”
She then describes the evolution of her relationship and how it started with her working for his nonprofit organization and stated “it’s evolved to so much more”. In essence by saying she is everything to him and how their relationship evolved into so much more, said through her telling body language, she is revealing a lot to us about the nature of their relationship which in my view includes intimacy.
When she says that their relationship has become a “scandal” she cocks her head to the side on the word “scandal,” which is very telling.
Barbara tries to coax it out of he by inserting ” you love him like a friend”. Here we see Stiviano trying to concoct the right answer as she looks to the right and has a bit of cotton mouth as she sticks her tongue out before she speaks and licks her lips.
In addition, her mouth gets dry as she says the word and licks her lips on the word”scandal” which shows a lot of anxiety and how there may be decption.
Then Barbara asks her why it became such a scandal and her breathing changes. Stivano takes seconds to answer. This means she is trying to manufacture the right words. She finally comes up with “God” and throws God into the mix by saying “I think God has it’s purpose”. It is interesting that she refers to God as an “it” which further speaks to her not really believing what she is saying. She also blinks a lot and looks side to side and contradicts herself again. Instead of sticking with her God answer as she says ” I wish I could answer that question.”
Then she says after moments of silence and failure to come up with the right answer she says ” I keep asking myself how when and why but the truth is that”… When someone says “the truth is that..” know that a lie will usually follow which it most likely did as she says ” how and why don’t even matter anymore as some things need to be brought to the light.” In essence she has told everyone that she brought out the tapes into the light about Sterling’s racism.” In essence she admits what she did in this statement she made.
She then further incriminates herself as she said” we are forced into situations that we have to do good by.” which mens she felf forced to reveal the tapes. Whether she claims she didn’t release them as her lawyer insists, there is no doubt that she was behind it as she essentially admitted it just now.
Then she goes on to say how Sterling is being tested by a higher power and how she is being “forced to come to his rescue.” The word “forced” says a lot. It means that she is not doing it willingly but some handlers or lawyers are “forcing” the to team up so they get their story straight. After all it is a huge crime in California to tape someone without their knowledge. So she is most likely being forced to make nice to Donald so he will say he knew she was taping him (something I find very hard to believe). This was a personal conversation and no one would ever want such information taped under any circumstances. Her silence and hesitations and long pause time, looking up and down and shoulder shrugs and changes in her breathing show she is being deceptive in her motive.
When asked buy Barbara if they had a financial arrangement. We immediately see Stiviano purse her lips which indicates Body language wise that she doesn’t want to discuss their financial arrangement. Barbara asks her if he pays her as an employee. Stiviano shows all types of signs of discomfort with this question as she hesitates and looks down and then says “at first he started paying me as an employee and then he started paying me off the books.” She has just incriminated herself and Sterling with the IRS. She has just invited an IRS audit. Where are the taxes going and who is paying the taxes on what she is paid off the books? She didn’t say “gifts.” She said “off the books. This is a very serious revelation that will no doubt come back to haunt them both.
Then she immediately looks to the other side and says I love him like a “father figure” as she shrugs her shoulders, which is a signal of deception in my view. How could anyone who has any Black in them love anyone as a father figure role whom they would have to allegedly respect, after he spoke that way about a race she allegedly has in her own blood.
When Sterling says in the tape “why you taking pictures with minorities?” it should be enough for her to realize that she is a minoritity and he deep down, hates her because he hates minorities.
That makes me wonder if indeed she is Black as I cannot imagine anyone who has any Black heritage in them using the term “love” in relation to Donald. She also claims that she changed her name to V. Stiviano because she was “Not yet fully accepted because of her race”.
If she was that race conscious then how could she “love” Sterling, who has not fully accepted her because of her race.
Barbara then repeats “you love him like a father” Instead of saying “yes” and looking directly at Barbara, she looks down and shakes her head No and repeats what she said earlier “just like a father fiigure “.
She also shrugs her shoulder and has a smug smile which indicates to me that she has clearly rehearsed the term” father figure” and is sticking with the script.
No one calls their father or “father figure” baby or honey as she did in the tape. So she knows very well that what she is saying most likely is not true. Hence the smug smile you see above in the interview when she sticks to the script and repeats her rehearsed “father figure”.
The word “honey” in addressing her “father figure” was used several times throughout the tape as you see above. He also addressed her as “honey” in the tape.
The reciprocal “honey’s” show to me that there was no father figuring going on here.
Barbara asks her about why she is wearing the visor and Stiviano says it is because she is in pain. As she says this she looks around as to search for the correct answer as she can’t very well tell the truth as to why she is doing it- for attention. She says how it hurts to have people speculate and say things about you when they don’t know you. If what she was saying was true she would have stayed in doors and not roller skated with her visor in front of the press or worn the visor at night where she told press she wanted to be President of the United States. She then says she wears the visor (her mask) because it’s easier to “mask” the pain.” This is a manipulative statement in my view.
Then she finally reveals the truth in my view, through her body language. Barbara asks what is the biggest misconception about her. She gives a genuine and broad smile as says “That I’m a mistress”. That says it all in my view that she has revealed that she is indeed a mistress. A person who had people misconceiving them would show anger and a much different facial demeanor than Stiviano. She goes on to add “or a whore” as she laughs and adds or ‘a woman of the night” . She then adds and all “those ‘miscomception’ are on my instagram I think. ” She has clearly not carefully thought through what she was saying as she stammers, mispronounces the words misconception and uses improper grammer, something she had not done previously. It shows that here is an emotional charge here and she is flummoxed as she reveals the truth by this body language behavior.
She finally takes a dig at her BFF who was giving interviews about her to TMZ saying that journalists are doing doing their job by interviewing that person when she doesn’t know the facts.
In summary, V. Stiviano has shown signals of deception on this tape and has incriminated herself and Donald as she talks about payment off the books, Body language wise she tells us that she is his mistress as well as through all the contradictions she made. It is my view that this is not the end for this manipulative mistress who is paid off the books and who is doing all she can to become allies with Donald so that he sticks to her story that he agreed to have his racist remarks taped.
Before I begin my analysis I want to say, that I have always been a fan of Michael Jackson’s talents. I have appreciated his genius as a performer- his singing voice quality and his amazing abilities as a dancer and choreographer.
But as a person, I personally observed something odd about him. Years ago,while Michael was an adult in his mid 30’s I happened to be in a video store and observed him sitting on the floor in the children’s section wearing a surgical mask and giggling to himself as he picked up various children’s videos. This was during the period where Michael had not yet had any children of his own and was parading his pet monkey around town. The first thought that went through my mind as I saw him sitting on the video store floor was that he was obviously stuck in childhood as he looked like a big child with a surgical mask on.
Last week, when I heard that Michael was once again being accused of sexual molestation, a part of me did not want to believe this, especially since the person accusing him, accused him a little too late. The accuser also swore on Michael’s behalf in a court of law that he was Never molested by Michael. But now that there is a wrongful death claim going on now,the timing of his accusations seemed suspect to me.
So when I was asked by NBC”S Access Hollywood to view the accuser’s video as he appeared on the Today Show, I was thinking I would see some signals of deception and state that this was yet another opportunistic individual who wanted part of Michael’s financial pie.
But as I closely listened to and look at the tape of Wade Robeson speaking to Matt Lauer, it was just the opposite.
The young man was articulate. He was direct and well spoken, His voice pattern was solid without hesitation. He appeared forthright . His body language and facial animation matched what he said in terms of content and emotion.For instance when he spoke in the negative, his head shook “no”. Conversely when he spoke in the affirmative, his head shook “yes’.
When he spoke it was heartfelt. On numerous occasions, he even, gestured towards his heart when he spoke.
There was also a vulnerability when he spoke as he grabbed his neck towards his adam’s apple (the most vulnerable part of our body). He was open with his emotions and verbally stated he was angry at Michael for what he allegedly did to him. You saw this anger in his raised eyebrow as you can see above.
The interview took it’s toll on Wade Robeson as you could see the visible perspiration around his cheeks and above his upper lip. he was not comfortable discussing what Michael had allegedly done to him.It was highly emotional for him.
Wade also tries to make sense of what Michael allegedly did to him by stating that Michael was a “troubled man.” It shows that he does indeed display some compassion towards Michael along with the anger he revealed.
He speaks with conviction as he states that Michel was a talented man as well as being a “pedophile” and a “sexual abuser”. he is direct as he says this and there are no signals of deception whatsoever.
Bu back in 2008, when Robeson stated Michael did not molest him there were numerous signals of deception
One sign of deception was that he was blinking a lot as he was being asked questions about Michael.
When asked in 2008 why it was important to stick up for Michael, Robeson shakes his head ‘no’, turns his mouth downward and looks away to search for answer.
He then shrugs his shoulder which is a huge signal of deception based on the context of what was being said, and said ” He’s always been a friend to me . “That’s what friends do”.
So in essence, he tells us in 2008 that he was doing his friend Michael a favor by sticking up for him. His signals of deception say it all.
In my view, Robeson is now telling the truth. But why now? Why not come clean when Michael was alive? Well there are a lot of reasons from feeling ashamed of what happened, to being in denial, to not wanting to make waves, to not reaping the consequences of having to fight Michael who had more power and more money to defend himself. Also for sticking up for his friend as Wade admitted in 2008, he many have reaped some benefits from Michael from possible financial benefits, perks, and even Michael’s providing positive references for him as a choreographer he may also have felt a loyalty to Michael at the time. Finally as a heterosexual male, he may not wanted to publicly or even privately admit that he engaged in a homesexual experience at any point in his life.
Oftentimes, when one does have a child,it can bring back one’s one memories and experiences as a child. Robeson said that when he looks at his young son and thinks of anyone doing to his child what was done to him, it sickened him. Perhaps his young son allowed him to become more honest with his feelings and with his past experiences.
I have held off on writing about Jodi Arias until I had something significant to say. But after watching her on the stand for eight days and listening to her sickeningly sweet phony vocal tones and watching one signal of deception after another I have something to say. Today the REAL Jodi showed up on the stand and I am here to talk about it. .
I have always said in my books that you MUST beware of anyone that has a sickening sweet soft spoken voice, where you can barely hear them at times. I have said they are phonies and you must RUN because there is a lot of built up anger and hostility that this type of voice pattern masks. Now here is living proof of what I have been talking about in the Jodi Arias trial. She went from meek mouse tone to roaring lion tone as she displayed cockiness and anger toward the prosecutor.
This is Not good for her because juror swill clearly see the REAL Jodi as they
will get a glimpse of her anger and what she must have been like around Travis. They will see how she could turn on him on a dime. They can now see her anger up close and personal.
The jury also also saw her lying first hand. Prosecutors had her hold her up her hand. Her finger was bent . She said it got that way months before Travis’ death as he abused her.
Then the prosecutor showed a photo of her after Travis was killed and the hand was not bent. It was a photo taken allegedly months after he beat her.
She sat there and LIED in front of everyone that her finger was bent. There was no way her finger was bent as anyone with eyes could see that. This is yet another nail in her coffin towards the death penalty.
The prosecutor asked her about her memory and when it fails he and she look aways and said “Usually when men like you are screaming
at me or grilling me or someone like Travisdoing the same.
That was a BAD move on Jodi’s part as she just lost her “sympathy” vote from any of the jurors who are gullible enough to have previously fallen for her poor me victim testimony.
Her nasty retort was anything but victim like. It was a dig at the prosecutor and it will in my estimation but another nail in her coffin.
Then he asks so that affects your memory. Her she shows DUPING DELIGHT where there is a slight smile on her face as she says “Yes that makes my brain scramble.”
Her slight smile which leaked out showed she was happy she felt she got a dig into the prosecutor and compared him to Travis. But what this stupid woman doesn’t realize is that it may have cost her her life . It may have angered jurors that she painted the prosecutor with the same brush she painted Travis. The jurors saw how he asked her simple question about her memory and now she took it to a level of indirectly accusing the prosecutor of verbally abusing her.
Her smiling during the prosecution’s questioning is not good either. There is NOTHING to smile about when a man has been brutally killed like Travis was and when her life is on the line. Jurors will pick that up and it will be a turn off to them. Perhaps she has been conditioned by others that her smile gets her what she wants. But it certainly won’t be the case here. Her smile for the first time in her life will work against her.
Will Jodi die by lethal needle? Usually it is reserved for people who have killed their children or spouses or a both, or a parent, in Arizona like the three women who are already on death row there. Each of these women also sought to benefit financially from the death where Jodi did not. So Jodi’s cases a little different in that regard.
However given the brutality of the murder that the jurors were forced to see, Jodi’s lies from the past and witnessing her lies right in front of their eyes with regard to her finger, her smugness, and her belligerent attitude with the prosecutor, Jodi Arias may very well be joining these three woman.
It is a myth that because a woman is pretty she won’t get the death sentence.One woman who was on death row and executed in Texas was quite beautiful and could pass as a Kardashian with her long brown hair, dark eyes, olive skin, and pretty features.
All three women who are on Arizona’s death row are attractive. So it shows that looks really don’t matter these days as far as the death penalty is concerned.
Actually Jodi is doing all she can to not be attractive with her greasy hair limp hair, no makeup, and glasses in her attorney’s or a jury consultant’s misguided coaching to have her not look like a sexy bombshell she looked like in the photos with Travis.
Was Travis and angel? Far from it! Was he a hypocrite with regard to his Mormon religion which doesn’t believe in premarital sex. Yes. Was he a jerk in that he used Jodi for sex and wanted to marry a decent Momon girl. Yes. Did he give her mixed messages? You bet . But did he deserve to die in such a brutal way? No way!
If the man was wet and naked it made him even more vulnerable and juror will pick that up. Even if he did get mad at her for dropping the camera and she claims she killed him in self defense. It was OVERKILL which means she despised him and most likely planned this attack at one point or another. Maybe it was a fantasy that ran through in her mind from time to time for how awful he treated her. But the fact that she executed it with such force shows the built up anger and hate she was harboring towards him.
That leads me back to her voice. The voice mirrors what goes on in your head and your heart as Galen the Greek philosopher once said. Jody hand a lot of rage and anger in her heart and it was clearly mirrored in her voice until it was unleashed today by the prosecutor.
As a body language expert I found that watching Cindy and George Anthony;s performance on Dr. Phil where they told so many lies, including a major one about a brain tumor made me very upset. It is no wonder that Casey is the way she is and that Caylee is dead not only because of Casey, but because of George and Cindy as well. After watching these two liars I believe that poor Caylee would never have stood a chance in that family.They have completely dishonored this baby as they continue to defend Casey at all costs.
Prosecutors going to are not going to pursue perjury charges against Cindy Anthony, Casey Anthony’s mother for her lying testimony during her Casey’s murder trial.
During the trial, Cindy shocked prosecutors by testifying she did internet searches for chloroform on the family’s computer. Prosecutors believed, along with sheriff’s investigators, that Casey Anthony had performed the search and not Cindy.
Witnesses then challenge Cindy’s claim. Days after the verdict, it was believed that prosecutors might charge her with perjury but they did not do so.
Currently they are looking into allegations of witness tampering, which did not involve Cindy Anthony.
I must say I am appalled at their decision to not go after Cindy for lying. Anyone else who lied on the stand would be fined and jailed for contempt of court. Maybe the prosecution feels she suffered enough.
So now we have a free Casey for probably killing her child, whether it be intentional or an accident. She didn’t get charge for manslaughter or anything other than lying to police. And now we have a free Cindy who blatantly lied to the court to try and save her daughter. What is wrong with this picture?
When Rep. Anthony Weiner gave a press conference about tweet where he sent a young college girl a photo of his
His expression of shame was consistent as he continued to look down when he spoke. Then his shame turned to
sadness as you can see by the downturn of his lips. He also had extreme anger as you can see by the muscle tension in his lower jaw. He is so angry that the muscle literally bulging out.
His anger continued as he refused to answer questions . He was asked point-blank if he sent the tweet to the college student and refused to answer. He was even pressed to just answer yes or no . He refused to do so and became angrier as you can see in the photo above.
Her we see him pull on his nose , which is a classic signal of deception. He did this just before he tried to spin a lame story. He said that if someone in an audience threw a pie at him, he wouldn’t address it and draw attention to it. He was trying to make the analogy to his particular embarrassing situation but it didn’t work.
The press told him that this was not the same situation and insisted on his giving a yes or no answer/ He refused to do so an became more defensive and more angry.
When people become defensive and angry and refuse to answer direct questions, it usually means they have something to hide. Clearly, no one hacked his account and clearly he sent the embarrassing photo to the college student.
Obviously, he was trying to impress the girl and show her that she turned him on by showing her the budge in his undies. What slipped his mind was that as a public figure, everything he does is public including his tweets. But the most important thing that slipped his mind
was that he was MARRIED! What is a married 46-year-old doing tweeting a photo of his erect crotch to a possible teenager or 20-year-old? While this is bad enough, his evasiveness and deception are making things worse for him. It will not be tolerated by the public.
Lying is what almost got Clinton impeached. He lied about “having sex with that woman Ms. Lewinsky”. Unlike Clinton, Weiner needs to be truthful and admit his shameful error in judgement. If he doesn’t do it, the bad news is that he may get voted out of office. But if he does get voted out of office it may open other doors for him, like his own television show.
Look at Elliott Spitzer, former married Governor of NY who did something even worse. He took up with prostitutes and look where it got him. It got him his own show on CNN. Since Weiner has friends in the media who have powerful positions, he could easily get his own segment on his buddy Jon Stewart’s Daily Show or even his own spin off. www.drlillianglass.com