First and foremost, unlike NY Fire Department contract psychologist, Suzanne Lachman, I have absolutely NO political or personal agenda against Trump or any politician for that matter. As a body language expert and journalist with a strong background in psychology, I report what I see and hear without bias. So when I saw that psychologist Lachman declared Trump “unfit for office” I saw someone who I believe is not acting professionally or ethically for that matter.
In fact, countless trained professionals both Republicans and Democrats have called for her to lose her license. They feel what she did was not only irresponsible but unethical. As a licensed professional in the field of psychology, she cannot use her profession to discuss anyone she has not treated or make defamatory statements about their ability to serve in office or not. She can report traits she observed, but it is not her professional place to draw any conclusions about how fit one is or is not to be in office. This is going over the line.
Lachman is saying that because she had a contract with the Fire Department of New York, she felt qualified to make the call about Trump. The logic in this seems extremely flawed. In fact, the FDNY just sent out a notice that they are distancing themselves from Lachman and from her tweets. In fact, Frank Gribbon, a spokesman for FDNY, told the Post Lachmann’s tweets should not be associated with her work for the Department.‘It’s inappropriate to cite her work with FDNY in social posts that express political views,’ he said.
Upon further investigation, it is clear that Lachman’s rant against Trump is both political and personal. Below is a screenshot of Lachman’s political bias reflected in her Facebook pages. She shows how she is pro Welcoming Refugees and shows how she is a huge fan of Obama as she posts a photo of Obama shaking hands with a janitor, as well as a photo of Trump in an unflattering pose which is clearly photoshopped.
Apparently, she is also a part of Rosie O’Donnel’s minion ( Trump’s arch enemy) which she posted on her FB account. Thus, she may very well be involved in raising money or participating in a documentary where she will state that Trump has dangerous psychological disorders as you see below.
And finally, her rant against Trump goes far beyond political, it is very personal with her, as she shows a billboard of Trump with a bird shitting on Trump’s head. That is not professional or even political. It is personal.
In fact, Lachmann said that she met Trump back in 1992 (26 years ago) when she stated that she introduced herself to him at a social event. She says that he said to her” Why would I want to talk to you? I wouldn’t even let you suck my dick.”
First of all, he may or may not have said this. But let’s say he did say this. I seriously doubt he said it in one sentence at the same time. The first response “Why would I want to talk to you?” was most likely in response to something said to him first. Then a more severe response “I wouldn’t even let you suck my dick” was most likely a severe response to something negative that was definitely said to him first. Trump is a responder, not an initiator. He doesn’t begin it. Instead, he finishes it.
As we ALL know, NOTHING happens in a vacuum. There is always a stimulus and a response to every situation. I seriously doubt that Trump would make those comments unprovoked, based on everything we know about him in terms of what he has demonstrated publicly all these years.
For instance, his infamous “grab em by the pussy comment” was not made in thin air with no stimulus to provoke his admission that he feels that this is what you can do to women when you are a celebrity. Instead, it was stimulated by very immature, macho, showing off, bravado to impress former entertainment reporter Billy Bush. If Billy was silent and had not instigated the conversation, Trump would most likely not have mentioned this at that particular time. So if you carefully examine the dynamic of the Billy Bush and Donald Trump pussy grabbing conversation, there was a stimulus-response and action-reaction going on.
Similarly, there was no doubt a stimulus-response and action-reaction going on in his communication with Suzanne Lachman. She makes it a point to mention that she met him in 1992 “right after his divorce from Ivana.”
In doing this statement analysis, she doesn’t say “I met him in 1992” or “in the early 90’s”. Instead, she qualifies it with the statement “right after his divorce from Ivanka.” She also says it was a “social event” which leads one to question whether she was making her move towards the newly single available Donald Trump.
Seeing that Lachmann is no shrinking violet and rather aggressive media-wise, it may be that she was equally aggressive in her interaction with Trump and perhaps she let him know she was interested in him on a personal level. Maybe Trump tried to let her down gently to let her know he wasn’t interested or maybe not.
With no intention of looks shaming Lachmann, she is clearly not Trump’s type based on his history of dating perfect body, nose, and teeth fashion models and Playboy Playmates. Perhaps Lachmann didn’t take the hint and kept persisting until he may have been crass and rejected her outright by letting her know that he dates models and Playmates only.
This may have both embarrassed and upset Lachmann, which may have possibly led her to make a disparaging comment to Trump in order to help her assuage her hurt feelings towards his initial rejection of her. It seems she may have possibly retaliated with a response that would be something like ” I would never want to go to bed with you” or taking it to the extreme, she may have even said to him “You probably have a small dick” or “Fuck you”.
Now we ALL know that when a disparaging comment is made to Trump, he claps back even harder. He doesn’t instigate. Instead, he retaliates and he retaliates not with a hammer but with a submachine gun. He even mentions this in “Art of the Deal” and in all of his books and in public interviews. We have also seen it first hand when Marco Rubio started with him saying that Trump had little hands, to which Trump coined him ” Little Marco”. Most recently when Robert DeNiro publicly at the Tony Awards said ” Fuck Trump”, Trump clapped back calling him “Punchy DeNiro”- as in “punch drunk”. He did the same to Maxine Waters who called for his impeachment, He immediately responded and called her “Low Intelligence Maxine.” “Dishonest Hillary” came about from Clinton’s personal attacks as did negative monikers for anyone who started with him.
So based on Trump’s pattern of behavior, it seems highly plausible that Suzanne Lachmann made a negative remark directly to Trump, most likely concerning something related to his sexuality in order to make hersef feel better and to mollify her rejection ( like “I wouldn’t want to sleep with you because you probably have a little dick” or “Suck it” ” You’re uch a dick” or “Fuck you’ or something to that effect) This, in turn, may have caused him to retaliate in sexual terms and even more vulgarly by stating to her” I wouldn’t let you suck my dick.”
There had to be a hostile sexual exchange of words between these two as nothing happens in a vacuum. It seems highly plausible that she started with him by saying something nasty or derogatory and he simply finished it in his Trump way.
Now she is using her position Psychologist and using the NYPD Fire Department to add to her credibility to retaliate and have the last word to trash Trump publically. But what she failed to realize is that she trashed herself as “hate consumes the hater.”
This will all backfire on her as s it already has, The FDNY has distanced themselves from her so I doubt they will be renewing any contracts with her. And she will no doubt be under investigation by her licensing board and may very well lose her license to practice psychology.