Body Language of Recent Trump Accusers All Show Signals of Deception with Hillary Supporter Gloria Allred at the Helm

Having written the book Body Language of Liars, I know a thing or two about deception. As  a result of my  intense analysis of all of Trump’s recent accusers of his sexually harassing them, I have found that they  showed signals of deception. And unlike Gloria Allred who is representing many of these women,   I Ido not have an agenda. I am unbiased in my reporting and do not favor one candidate over another.  Gloria Allred is clearly a staunch Democratic supporter and was even a delegate for Hillary Clinton.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 2.14.16 PM.png

I have never been a delegate for anyone . I am in no one’s political pocket. I have met both candidates up close and personal  on several occasions and they have both been warm and gracious to me. I have no hard feelings towards either of them. Even though this blog is about Trump,  knowI would do the same thing for Hillary if accusers came out about her and showed signals of deception.

First and foremost why would anyone report Trump’s bad behavior 24 days into the election and not sooner? They had a whole year to do so. Yet now it comes out. This does not sit well with me.

There is no question that Trump acted like an immature teen 11 years ago as he was trying to impress  Billy Bush he was “the man”  but if you really stop and  analyze what Trump said , he was talking about his being a famous celebrity  ( and he was a new one at the time with his show the Apprentice)  and how as a celebrity he found he  had  access to women , many of whom would him you do anything to them and who allow him to cross all boundaries  “including grabbing their pussy” Yes,it was crude and lewd and unbecoming of a  man running for  the highest office in the  land. But he was not running for anything then, He was just another entitled celebrity who found that he could take liberties because he was famous.

Unfortunately this is  a reality and extremely common with many male celebs as I have seen it with my own eyes. Because they are rich and famous they have access to the most beautiful women, many of whom would do anything for them just to touch that fame. I have seen it with my own eyes.I have seen female fans take liberties with celebs. I even saw one come up to a celeb with whom I was dancing and grab his genitals right in front of me.  Look at all the rock stars. Many of them have admitted that they got into the business to get women. Many of them wouldn’t even garner a second look if they weren’t in a band or had fame with the exception of Brett Michaels.I have also seen it the other way. I have seen a celeb have his arm around a woman’s back whom  he just met and try to unhook her bra. And she bragged  of it later and laughed about it. So it works both ways.


Trump is all bravado when it comes to his being the ladies man as he admitted during the debates . As we all heard and saw he admitted that he grabbed no one’s pussy.


Trump is all bravado when it comes to his being the ladies man as he admitted during the debates as he admitted that he grabbed no one’s pussy. We also see how his bark is bigger than his bite when he got of the bus and didn’t even touch the  soapstar  even reach his hand out to her. She was the one who did as you cans see..


He didn’t  have any contact with her until Billy Bush told her to hug Trump.  And even then he was stiff and stand-offish. She is the tone who touched and grabbed him.

Trump may be a lot of things but he is not insane and he does not go around touching women’s privates. Now that the bus incident happened and was blown way about of proportion in my view in terms of EXACTLY what he said and how it was interpreted, it gave license to a lot of “15 minute of Famers”and wanna be;s to come out and tell how he harassed them.  Well if he harassed you , I ask ALL of them “WHY DIDN’T YOU COME OUT EARLIER?”  Why did you need Gloria Allred to hold your hand when you fake cried and do a presser?  And these allegations occurred 25 to 38 years ago. The did not happened yesterday, last week, or even 5 years ago.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 3.07.56 PM.png

Let’s look at the body language of these accusers. I won’t even bother with the ridiculous contestants who said Trump went backstage when they were dressing because that is ridiculous like Miss Vermont’s claim that he came backstage at the Miss Teenage America Pageant.

First of all these girls are always in some state of dress or undress as they get in and out of costume changes in minutes to get ready for the next song and dance number or gown or bathing suit competition So backstage is a giant dressing room with everyone from dressers to technical people to choreographers, to producer to other  TV people  to executives who own the pageant ( like Trump) – men and women, coming in and out freely.

There are also racks that the girls can go behind if they are super shy. The woman have chaperones at all times and there is no foul play.  This is especially true in underage pageants like Miss Teenage America. This I can assure you as I have been a judge in the Miss USA Pageant before Trump bought the brand. If I owned the brand, I would be backstage as well to make sure there were no issues. And there are issues backstage- plenty of them that often require  an executive in charge’s decision.


Here is a former  Miss Utah who has accused Trump of kissing her on the lips.This is a clearly ridiculous non-story and smear attempt. For someone who is describing how Trump kissed her on the lips this former Miss Utah is sure smiling a lot as she describes both encounters with him. If she was so put off by the kisses he gave her why didn’t she turn her head or tell him to stop it. I would never let anyone kiss me I didn’t want to kiss me- not even once and definitely not twice And then she describes it as a quick peck.

So she is making a mountain out of a molehill here. If it was a long drawn out makeout kiss or a French kiss with a tongue in her mouth I could see her point. But this is ridiculous. And fyii in showbiz a quick buss on the lips is often standard fare. And at 3:22 you see where she leaks out the truth that she didn’t think he was trying to hit on her, yet she comes forth 15 years later. And then she is asked about what she thought about Trumps leaked bus tape and she immediately cries on cue and starts talking about her little daughter and cries bigger tears as she says “you think of sending your little daughter out there with men like that” WHAT???? Trump was talking about grown women not babies when he spoke to Billy Bush on the bus.

Then she says you look at your sweet innocent daughter and this is the world I am raising her in as she referred to an incident by Trump on a bus that occurred 11 years ago, which is less worse than times are now. She doesn’t have to send her baby daughter anywhere . If her daughter turns on the radio and listens to some hip hop,she is bound to hear far worse things than Trump said as she listens to being called a bitch and a ho and other vile references.

If her daughter goes online she will see far worse than what Donald Trump said. She will see nudity and sexual acts and if one of her her little friends show her the right link to click. She may even see porn or Kim Kardashian engaging in a lewd oral sex act. And then this former Miss Utah leaks out how her father worked for Ronald Reagan. After watching this laughable contrived tape, it is clear that this was yet another smear attempt.

And if someone did this to Hillary and tried to smear her in this way, I would say the exact same thing. Mis Utah’s 15 minutes of fame has just backfired on her in my view. In her attempt to smear Trump, she smeared herself.


screen-shot-2016-10-15-at-2-41-02-pmNow we see a Gloria Allred client with Gloria  at her side holding her hand as she fake cries  just like Gloria does for all of her other clients during her pressers. This woman is a  Season 5 Apprentice  loser who hit Trump up for some money for a restaurant she wanted him to invest it. perhaps he said no and that is her motive for coming out 24 days before the election.

What first struck me as odd was the way she spoke to Trump calling him  “dude” and using colloquial terms that no one would say to a boss – especially Trump if she was previously on the Apprentice and if she was looking for him to invest in her business. I also doubt that Trump would use the term “tele tele” as he is not one for cutsie  indirect phrases as we have seen. She said  that she said to him “COME ON MAN GET REAL” First of all if Trump was told this (having the narcissistic personality that he has) he would have told her to leave. Trump cannot tolerate disrespect and this disrespectful verbiage would have turned him off. completely. Also why would she say “man” to someone whom she was looking to do business with. Based on his personality type I seriously doubt her tries to kiss her again after he rejected her and mocked her by saying  “get reeel” as she said. It does not ring true to me. Then she reported she said “Dude you’re trippin right now.” To me that is complete BS as if she made any reference to Trump  “trippin” or drug related, he would kick her out immediately as he is extremely anti -drug of any sorts. Also who uses those phrases to a boss or someone with whom you were going to do business? The answer is no one!

Then she shows just how ridiculous she is by saying that he showed her a fruit basket to show her how important her was? Are you serious??? Trump, a billionaire  real estate mogul with the number one hit show on TV  doesn’t have to show anyone a fruit basket to show how important he is. He IS important and if she didn’t  realize that it shows that this is completely bogus in my view.

When one reads her allegation and stumbles over the words  that is the first sign something may be amiss. She has a fake crack in her voice which recovers too quickly for there to be any truth in what she had said. When your voice cracks and you are upset you continue that cracking for more than a millsecond.You may even be rendered voiceless as a result of the tesnion on your vocal cords. So when the recovery is so quick, it is usually fake. There were no tears as well. And if there were tears it would be even more ridiculous to show emotion over an event that happened 11 years ago in 2005.

And what was she doing in a hotel room with Trump in Beverly Hills in the first place? If she was there for dinner  as she said why didn’t she meet him at the restaurant or in the lobby and not in his hotel room?  It makes one wonder if this  this a consensual sexual liason that was about to take place.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 3.04.47 PM.png

Now we have an accuser who claims to have been on a now defunct airline – Braniff Airlines with Trump, sitting in First class 38 years ago!

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 3.37.01 PM.png

She began by showing photos of her as a young woman with short hair to show how she looked back then. As we all know by now, Trump has and has always had specific preferences regarding women and beauty and with all due  respect this woman does not to me seem like she would have been Trump’s type . Trump tended to be more attracted to a curvier  and bustier woman that was more glamorous.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 3.37.15 PM.png

As she recounted the alleged incident I see many signals of deception from her hands moving and her fidgeting, excessive blinking. When she said that it was a shock that Trump’s hands were all over her she does a micro head movement where she shakes her head no. This means that his hands may not have been all over her. Also if there are no body language signals that you are interested  in Trump or flirting with Trump his narcissistic personality  would not pursue you. So my question is ” Did you give Donald any signals that indicated you were interested in him for him to make that alleged move on you? Di d you say anything provocative to him or were you indicating that you may have wanted to get involved with him on a physical level?  It takes a lot of effort to move the seat divider so if there were no signals coming from you, Donald would not have wasted the effort based on his personality type. I should point out that there was a man who was an alleged witness to the event from the UK who said he say this woman all over Trump and up  in his space.  When she says she hesitates to use the term : he was like an octopus with 6 arms allover the place: she shakes her head no which is also a sign of deception on her part.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 3.52.56 PM.png

Then she blows it when she says if he stuck with the upper part of her body she “might not have gotten so upset but when he started putting his hand up my skirt :. As she says this the palms of her hands are not showing- only the back of her hands which to me shows deception. She also purses her lips after wards which is another signals of deception to me.

The fact that she says its Ok to touch her top but not her lower part, says a lot to me. Itis all related to the ” pussy grabbing comment.” that she is no doubt riding the PR smear train about.  As a woman if a man touched my breasts I would be just as upset as if he touched my lower parts.

In fact one day I was walking along a busy street in NYC  on my way to a meeting when  a stranger wearing a nice  suit came up to me and suddenly grabbed my breast and then briskly walked away.   I immediately ran after him and clocked  him in the jaw and screamed at him while he was standing there holding his face. So as a woman if I didn’t want a man to touch me  I wouldn’t allow any part of me to be touched and I would have made sure he knew it. That was not the case with this accuser. She said she would have been OK for him to touch her breasts and not her “pussy”. Then when she says :that was it” she looks away and looks down, further indicating deception to me. And that was it for me as I could no longer listen to this woman who clearly had an obvious :pussy” related agenda which she essentially leaked out.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 4.04.37 PM.png

Now we have yet another accuser from the 1990’s Apprentice who leaked out a smile as you see here. That is the first signal of deception. If  I was telling you the story about that Toxic Man on the streets of NYC who grabbed my breast while walking  down the street, you can rest assured I would never be smiling. Instead you would see a furrowed brow and a lot of upset as I re-lived the incident. This was not the case with this woman- Kristin Anderson. She continues to smile and has a shoulder shrug and says “the person on my right unbeknownst to me was Donald Trump.”

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 4.08.33 PM.pngThis indicates clear deception to me with the smile and shoulder shrug. How could anyone who has not lived under a rock not know who Donald Trump was. Also the smile shows deception to me.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 4.11.04 PM.png

Then she said  “Trump did touch my vagina through my underwear”. Look at her facial expression!  You see a raised eyebrow and wrinkled forehead which indicates the expression of doubt which clearly shows she is not being honest here in my view. One would not show doubt but rather anger if someone touched their vagina.

Again this is all BS and getting on the PR  Pussy Grabbing Smear Train based on the bus  conversation with Billy Bush.

And for those accusing me of supporting Trump. I would support anyone including Hillary  who was falsely accused and he is clearly being falsely accused by these woman who show multiple signals of deception. To me it is maddening and despicable.

And of course if you look at who Kristen Anderson’s lawyer is. Tt is none other than Gloria Allred, the Democratic operative who is 100 percent in Hillary’s camp and is doing this obvious dirty job to  take Trump down as best as she can.

Well it won’t work because  people know Gloria Allred’s game and intentions and people can see that these women all have an agenda and are trying to pull the “pussy card” based on Trump’s  bus conversation with Billy Bush.screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-11-17-20-am

The race card didn’t work with former Miss Universe Alicia Machado when she clearly lied as it was discovered. Trump never called her Miss Housekeeping or Miss Piggy as was determined via her multiple signals of deception. Her credibility was also shot as it was discovered she wanted to murder a judge and had a nefarious spast. She then came out to say she was no longer talking about her allegations towards Trump, because they were not true. if you are telling the truth you suddenly do not shut up about it like she did. Also if Trump was such as pussy grabber why didn’t she say he grabbed her pussy? I will tell you why. It is because  the tape on the bus had not yet come out and Gloria Allred didn’t get to her to represent her.

So let’s  STOP all this nonsense. Let’s get to the real issues as what both Trump and Hillary can do for our country and stop the distractions and focus on pussy grabbing.

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 4.28.27 PM.png














Sociopath? Ryan Lochte Shows No Body Language or Verbal Signals of Deception In Speaking of the Robbery

Screen Shot 2016-08-14 at 8.20.46 PMSwimming Gold Medalist  Ryan Lochte said he was a victim of an armed robbery in Brazil after coming home from a party  for one of his friends in Rio. He showed no signals of deception as he relayed the story to interviewer, Billy Bush. He was on point and spoke fluidly and fluently. He showed no body language signals of deception. Therefore I completely believe what he said about the robbery.

But the US Olympic Committee and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) denied Lochte’s account of what happened . It seems to me that they clearly may have  wanted to cover themselves and protect their own interests , since they made this statement without ever interviewing Lochte or any of the other alleged victims. It was reported that  both organizations didn’t even contact the alleged robbed swimmers after the robbery, even though they were all living at the Olympic village.

Ryan Lochte would have no reason to make up a robbery attempt. He certainly doesn’t need this type of attention and has never had a history of high drama. Whether anyone wants to admit it  or not, Rio is one of the most dangerous cities in the world as are so many other cities  in Brazil.

In fact, when I was in Sao Paulo, Brazil several years ago on a book tour, I was driven around in an armored car. So there was a great concern about crime. I also have a very close friend in Brazil and when we traveled around the city, we were also in an armored car and ran through all the red lights because to stop could get one robbed  and killed.

In my view, the US Olympic Committee and the IOC are not respecting one of their star athletes. Instead, they are essentially calling Lochte a liar.They clearly seem to believe that admitting that Rio is a dangerous city and that a robbery took place would be bad PR for the games, so they are spinning it.

Apparently, Lochte reported that the robbers were disguised as police . If they admitted Lochte’s story was accurate and word got out that robbers were posing as police officers in and in essence stopping  tourists and robbing them with guns to their head, this would be bad for the games and for their revenue.

Having a gun pointed at Lochte’s head as he said in a very calm manner, may have some sever lasting effects on him. perhaps he is now in a state of shock as to what actually happened to him. When some time passes and he has more time to process the event and that he could have lost his life, I would not be surprised if he showed symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder  (PTSD) in the future. The fact that his own US Olympic Committee and the IOC aren’t standing by him and supporting what happened to him will not doubt add to his injury and could have an emotional  effect on him. It could even have serious implications in terns of his psyche as an athlete.

So much of being a star athlete has to do with your mental abilities and focus as well as your physical prowess.If his own organizations are not behind him, it may have an effect on his motivation level in the future and on his psychological state . No one wants to be labeled as a liar when they have come forth and shared a life threatening experience.

The implications of Lochte being believed  and the committees causing doubt about what he said can potentially affect  his endorsements in the futures and ultimately, his finances. There may be a possibility that endorsers may shy away from Lochte as a result of this controversy created by the US and International Olympic  committees.

Tom Brady’s Body Language Shows Multiple Signals of Deception

Is Tom Bray a liar?

Here are some signals of deception which I observed during his press conference in response to the  crucial questions he was asked.

1. Smiling when asked if he’s a cheater  Hiis reponse is ” I don’t think so” Someone who would be asked if they were a cheater would not usually be smiling  if they were not a cheater as they would be angry about the accusation and reflect their anger in their facial expression.

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 11.07.57 AM

2. Shoulder Shrugs

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 11.10.49 AM

3. Gestures using back of his hand instead of palm of hand

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 11.01.14 AM

4. Rocks back and forth

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 11.03.14 AM

5.  He often  swallows hard a licks his lips and shows “cotton mouth”

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.36.29 AM,Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.53.10 AM

6. Scratches his head

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.40.44 AM

7. Repeats words and phrases  and often stammers

8.Blinks eyes rapidly,

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.35.51 AM

9. Shakes head no when he should be nodding it yes, especially seen when he is  talking about fair play.

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 11.04.35 AM

10. Dies off at the end of sentences where he can barely be heard,

11. Breathing changes as he  suddenly goes to upper chest breathing,

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.49.48 AM

12. Says “you know” often

13. Tension in midface  (nasal area) when saying he doesnt know what happened

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.50.35 AM

14. Lots of duping delight (inapproriate smiling) when talking about balls being touched and in other answers

Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.42.43 AMScreen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.32.02 AM

15. Lip pursing
Screen Shot 2015-01-24 at 10.44.04 AM

In my view he showed multiple signals of tension and deception during the press conference which disturbed me. if someone was not showing these signals they would have spoken with more gravitas and would have shown different facial and body language and speech and voice characteristics.

Michael Jackson Accuser’s Body Language, Voice and Speech Pattern Show Credibility

Before I begin my analysis I want to say, that I have always been a fan of Michael Jackson’s talents. I have appreciated his genius as a performer- his singing voice quality and his amazing abilities as a dancer and choreographer. 

But as a person, I personally observed something odd about him.  Years ago,while Michael was an adult in his mid  30’s I happened to be in a video store and observed him sitting on the floor in the children’s section wearing a surgical mask and giggling to himself  as he picked up  various children’s videos. This  was during the period  where Michael had not yet had any children of his own and was parading his pet monkey around town.  The first thought that went through my mind as I saw him sitting on the video store floor was that he was obviously stuck in childhood as he looked like a big child with a surgical mask on.

Last week, when I heard that Michael was once again being accused of sexual molestation, a part of me did not want to believe this, especially since the person accusing him, accused him a little too late. The accuser also swore on Michael’s behalf in a court of law that he was Never molested by Michael. But now that there is a wrongful death claim going on now,the timing of his accusations seemed suspect to me.  

So when I was asked by NBC”S  Access Hollywood to view the accuser’s video as he appeared on the Today Show, I was thinking I would see some signals of deception and state that this was yet another opportunistic individual who wanted part of Michael’s financial pie.

But as I closely listened to and look at the tape of Wade Robeson speaking to Matt Lauer, it was just the opposite.


The young man was articulate.  He was direct and well spoken, His voice pattern was solid without hesitation. He appeared forthright . His body language and facial animation matched what he said in terms of content and emotion.For instance when he spoke in the negative, his head shook “no”. Conversely when he spoke in the affirmative, his head shook “yes’.


When he spoke it was heartfelt. On numerous occasions, he even, gestured towards his heart when he spoke.

ImageThere was also a vulnerability when he spoke as he grabbed his neck  towards his adam’s apple (the most vulnerable part of our body). ImageHe was open with his emotions and verbally stated he was angry at Michael for what he allegedly did to him. You saw this anger in his raised eyebrow as you can see above.


The interview took it’s toll on Wade Robeson as you could see the visible perspiration around his cheeks and above his upper lip. he was not comfortable discussing what Michael had allegedly done to him.It was highly emotional for him. 

Wade also tries to make sense of what Michael allegedly did to him by stating that Michael was a “troubled man.” It shows that he does indeed display some compassion towards Michael along with the anger he revealed.


He speaks with conviction as he states that Michel was a talented man as well as being a “pedophile” and a “sexual abuser”. he is direct as he says this and there are no signals of deception whatsoever. 

Bu back in 2008, when Robeson stated Michael did not molest him there were numerous signals of deception


One sign of deception was that he was blinking a lot as he was being asked questions about Michael.


When asked in 2008 why it was important to stick up for Michael, Robeson shakes his head ‘no’, turns his mouth downward and looks away to search for answer.


He then shrugs his shoulder which is a huge signal of deception based on the context of what was being said, and said ” He’s always been a friend to me . “That’s what friends do”. 

So in essence, he tells us in 2008 that he was doing his friend Michael a favor by sticking up for him. His signals of deception say it all. 

In my view,  Robeson is now telling the truth. But why now? Why not come clean when Michael was alive? Well there are a  lot of reasons from feeling ashamed of what happened, to being in denial, to not wanting to make waves, to not reaping the consequences of having to fight Michael who had more power and more money to defend himself. Also for sticking up for his friend as Wade admitted in 2008, he many have reaped some benefits from Michael from possible financial benefits, perks, and even Michael’s providing positive references for him as a choreographer he may also have felt a loyalty to Michael at the time. Finally as a heterosexual male, he may not wanted to publicly or even privately admit that he engaged in a homesexual experience at any point in his life.

Oftentimes, when one does have a child,it can bring back one’s one memories and experiences as a child. Robeson said that when he looks at his young son and thinks of anyone doing to his child what was done to him, it sickened him. Perhaps his young son allowed him to become more  honest with his feelings and with his past experiences.



Baby Lisa’s Parents on Dr.Phil- Body Language Tells

Baby Lisa’s mom  looks up and away as she  immediately begins to show a crying face when asked about the Kansas police Department. But what is really wrong with the picture is that there are no tears as she transitions to a non crying facial expresion within milliseconds.

She gets defensive and says in a harsh and defensive tone  “It’s not a circus. It’s not a joke. ”  No one said it was a circus  or  joke? Her choice of words give us  a lot of insight as to what is going on inside her mind. When someone volunteers extraneous and tangential information  it often indicates a signal of deception.

She goes on to say “This is not a game. This is my baby.” Once again the word she chose -“game”  may be very revealing.  In analyzing her statement, when someone is playing games, they are usually the first to bring up the term “game” . It may very well indicate that they are indeed playing a game. In Deborah, Bradley’s case it may very well be the “cat and mouse game” she has allegedly been playing with police …..

To Read More Click  Link Below:

Kate Gosselin’s Anger, Pettiness, and Signals of Deception on the Today Show As She Discusses Kids Expulsion from School And Blames “The Divorce”


After watching Kate Gosselin’s  latest interview with Meredith Vierra  on the Today Show I saw an angry, bitter, and petty woman who just can’t let go of her hatred towards Jon.

She is in such denial that she does’nt have any clue that her inner hatred and anger is being mirrored by those kids and literally destroying them. As she took her anger out on Jon and continues to be filled with hatred, her kids are taking their anger and hatred out on the other kids. at school

They have anger issues because she has anger issues.  It’s not because of the divorce. It is because she is so angry about the divorce and that anger carries over to them.  Lots of kids are products of divorce and they don[t go around beating on and cursing at other kids.


Kate began the interview  kicking her legs. When someone kicks their legs when they are about to be interviewed it means they are very uncomfortable and are not looking forward to the interview because they probably will not be forthright with you.


Then in a monotone she says ” We are doing great” as she opens her eyes wide. This eye widening is often a signal of deception. Then she says We are very happy and adds the word “actually, ”When you have to add the word actually” it  most likely  means that things are not actually that great.

When Kate was asked about whether the  two of the kids were expelled from school she cocks her head to the side. This is  often a signal of deception. She then  speaks in a staccato hyper articulated  speech pattern  saying ” That is false.” When one does that,  it is usually signals deception. Also there was a lot of fidgeting with her hands. This  is another sign of deception.

Now we hear her convoluted attempts filled with ums. It does not make sense as it is disjointed. She is searching for words as she knows what she is saying is complete spin and nonsense.”

We have a situation where we my kids um are in an academic situation where academics  um are pushed and I fully support it. Combined with kids who were having to just go through with a divorce. Their parents suffering some of those normal feelings

When someone speaks in fragments like you see above  they are lying, When they speak in tangents they are lying.

The telling thing here is her words ” their parents suffering.” It shows just how narcissistic she is.  She doesn’t say the children are suffering but  instead brings it back to herself, saying that she is suffering.

Then she says and the two collided and they were not doing well  with the combination. What about a simple YES THEY WERE EXPELLED BECAUSE THEY ARE TROUBLED EMOTIONALLY!!

Body language wise look at Kate’s upturned palm.  What this means is she is begging for  Meredith and the audience to  to believe her roundabout circumvented deceptive  answer.

Look at Meredith’s facial expression.  It says that she isn;t buying Kate’s nonsense. either.


Kate says I felt so alone, I talked to other moms who had gone through the divorces. This is is NOT about Kate and her divorce.  It is about the kids but she is obviously too self absorbed to see that.

Then she protests so much as she shakes her head NO,  knowing full well what she is saying is complete BS as she says ’Its  NORMAL Stuff as she shakes her head no.

Then she suddenly looks down. This is a huge indicator of deception as she says I did what I could do we mutually  agreed. I brought them home with a private tutor

Then she says  …um um (she smiles as though she remembered to say something she left out as part of her spin)   She says and Early education teacher…

Kate is speaking in fragments which means she is most likely reciting some rhetoric she was no doubt told to say . She obviously messed up  her lines.’’

Then she shows just how in denial she is as she recites : It is dealing with  the very normal results of a divorce.”

WHAt???????? Most kids have parents who get divorced and  d they don’t beat one another and curse them like her kids allegedly  did.  How about admitting that their anger is the result of a hostile hateful and  angry mother whom  they no doubt mirrored. They saw her anger and abuse towards their father almost every  day of their young lives.’

Kate 7

Kate obviously knows what she is saying is complete BS. That is why she purses her lips in an attempt to hold back all the BS.


Then Kate Gets bitchy as she has to say how  Good  she is and how BAD  Jon is. She just has to tell one  just how she reached out to him first, and how it depend on the day and the hour , thus giving  him yet another zing . This is a man she not only emotionally   destroyed and emasculated throughout her marriage by hitting him and belittling him, but now  she has removed his voice

The man isn’t even allowed to go on the airwaves to defend himself or he will get fined and lose what little he does have.


Why does she have to go there? Why  can’t she leave him be? If he is the father of her kids and always will be as she made sure to say on the show, then she needs to leave him alone and stop trashing him.

He loves his kids and is the reason they will probably have a chance at life. He has only given them love nd affection.

Now that he has a beautiful lovely and beautiful woman in his life – Ellen Ross,  those kids will  finally know about a  healthy  male female relationship. They will see a man and a woman who respect one another not a man and a woman who constantly bicker like they saw with Jon and  Kate .

Then she says And Honestly when I think of the old days I try to email him and write him and give him a call. When someone starts a sentence with Honestly chances are they are not being honest,

Then Meredith relayed to Kate how  Jon apologized on his twitter account publicly for what he did to Kate. Instead of acting like a mature adult and saying I appreciate it or petty Kate  says she doesn’t consider interviews  and twitters an apology and that she never got a an  apology yet.”

HOW PETTY!!!!!!!!!

Kate,  get over it! Talking like that is what will ruin your kids forever. Your pettiness will transfer over to them.

Then she disgustingly says ” Strangely  and ironically  I have forgiven him..’’

If you have really  forgiven him then why the shoulder shrugs which indicate deception. Why all the  high drama?  In my view Jon is the one who needs to forgive you for abusing and emotionally torturing him until he went over the edge.


Then she leaks out  ” people who are close to me are upset that I don’t get that angry. And who are those people, Steve Neild the bodyguard?

Then  on the next breath she leaks out  “I am angry,” Then she changes her mind and says   What good does it does it do I don’t have time to waste”

But her expression and vocal inflection say it all. She scrunched up her face and goes up at the end of the statement as though she is asking a question. She clearly knows she does not believe what she is saying.

Kate, here is a very valuable message to you. Since the  therapist is  allegedly already  in the house to take care of the two angry home schooled kids, why not have a session with the therapist as well? The therapist can  help you get over your anger towards Jon.’

Your anger is making the kids angry which is destroying their little lives. Your anger is being mirrored by them in school. You talk about sending them back to school . Well here is a secret. They will never make it back and succeed there unless you get to the root of the problem-your deep rooted anger.


Kate haven’t you done enough to punish and destroy Jon? You have silenced the man so he cannot speak up or speak back. You have taken away opportunities for him to make big money on the media and now you are suing him for 125K for child support.

Please tell  us how this man is supposed to earn a living when you have destroyed his opportunities. Tell us how he is supposed to have a full time job and have no money for nannies and maids and still  take care of the kids when you are out and about?


Jon was apparently livid when Kate  left their  kids with a teenage babysitter whom he did not know and  the sitter was instructed by Kate  not to talk with Jon.

Kate just dismissed these concerns. The fact that two of the children showed behavioral problems would be a red enough flag for any parent to take their kids off the air. Jon has tried.let’s hope that  he succeeds before it is too late.Let’s hope that a disaster can be avoided. .

Does Tiffany Hartley’s Body Language, Facial and Vocal Tells Indicate Deception?


With the illegal immigration issues and anti-Mexican sentiment  that is prevalent  in so many  US border communities, the news story of Tiffany Hartwell,  who alleges her husband was shot in the head by some Mexican pirates on Falcon Lake,  seems to have  hit a nerve.

It  generates the fear that if you go into Mexico you may not come out alive. In fact Texas Governor Richard  Perry has even rallied behind the incident.  Jane Velez Mitchell even went so far as calling the woman a “hero.”

But in my view I see nothing heroic about this woman. In fact what I see are many signals of deception in her body language  and communication patterns that I  find disturbing.

While  there  been reports of Mexican pirates in the past, they   were all unharmed as the intention of the pirates  were all about robbery, not shooting for sport.


The shoulder shrugs, lip licking, like um and ums, monotone,  verbal inconsistencies in her story and choice of words make me question what really happened to her husband.

In her  911 call, she is asked if she is sure her husband has been shot, She said “yes in his head .But she doesn’t go on to elaborate about him- the alleged victim. She doesn’t say that  he was bleeding or incapacitated, which would happen if someone was in the head. Instead, she provides herself with an excuse or an alibi for his non survival and for her actions  by saying she is too weak to pull his body unto her Jet Ski. She was forced to abandon him there.

When something tragic happens to someone, you focus  on the person, not on yourself and what you did in the incident, unless you are perhaps involved in the incident.

Also how did she abandon him? Did she abandon him as he was frantically paddling in the water? Did he go underwater and drown? If a person is shot in the head as she said, especially with an assault weapon, brain damage would likely occur and the person may become unconscious and sink to the bottom of the lake.


When I saw the initial ABC interview of Tiffany Hartley it left me with a very  negative feeling and here is why.

The ABC interviewer says  to Tiffany that one of the reasons Mexican authorities aren’t helping her is because they don’t believe her- that they didn’t find a body or a jet ski and don’t even think there is a body.

Then she looks away and says that she can understand it from their point of  view  and has to put herself in their point of view to see how they could think that . WHAT???? There is no point of view if someone you love has been shot.

The fact that she stuck out her tongue and did some lip licking as she said this is a signal of deception in my view.

Her monotone voice as she said this was also disturbing.Then there is a HUGE signal of deception.

She looks down and shakes her head as she says It’s not only to immediately contradict herelf and say It is  true He is over there ( as she licks her lips while looking down) and I know the pirates or whoever did this (shakes her head NO) did this have him.

Wait a minute! How does she know the   pirates have him if   she abandoned him in the lake as she said she did because  was too small to get him on her jet ski? Also her saying  whoever did this may possibly reveal that someone else did this. Was that someone whoever did this -Tiffany?

Now here is where it really gets suspicious body language wise, voice and speech  pattern wise. Oftentimes and overly  defensive tone or righteous indignation indicate deception. This  was evident as she leans her body back and in a defensive tone says I would never think about hurting my husband said in a monotone as we suddenly see her  jaw move in a chewing motion as though she is causally chewing gum ! When you see this sudden type  of jaw movement it is often a signal of deception.

Then she asks  the rhetoric question “Why would I do this? as she leans back shrugs her shoulder and dies off in volume at the end of the sentence. This is a clear signal of deception. Oftentimes when one asks a question like this in a defensive tone, it usually indicates deception.


A week  after Tiffany called 911 and said she abandoned her husband because  he was too heavy for her to get up on her jet skis he now says I do believe they have him and they are hiding him WHAT?????  How would she know this if she allegedly abandoned him in the lake as she initially said  she did.

When asked about damage to the jet skis, she reports on the show that  there were no bullets on her jet ski. This was  too much information and often indicates deception.

Besides the defensive tone, the like um’s peppered throughout her speech, monotone devoid of emotion, faux tears and lip licking  were  major  giveaways throughout the interview that did not instill confidence as to whether or not she was telling the truth.


Tiffany is supposed to be talking about the alleged tragedy to that occurred to Fox and Friends but manages tell Gretchen Carlson that her show was  her husbands favorite show and how he watched it every morning. That is rather inappropriate considering the circumstances.She immediately became star struck.


Now we really see Tiffany all spruced up at her press conference. She clearly seemed to be enjoying all of her new-found attention. As  she defensively  says I know what I  saw,  we see her tell-tale tongue protrusion.

Then she says that people don’t know how it feels to see a barrel of a gun  pointed at you.WHAT??? This is the first time we heard about a barrel of a gun pointed at her. How could she be so close to seeing  a barrel of a gun – an assault weapon as she first described without being shot herself. Didn’t she say that her husband was on  his  jet ski when he was shot in the head- in the back of the head?

As she says this you see  her looking down and you see a shoulder shrug which is indicative of deception.

How could he see a barrel of a gun if the gun was pointed at her husbands back of his head?  And speaking of head, why did she point to the front  of her own head in one of the many  interviews she gave when describing where her husband was shot.

Why didn’t she point to the back of her own head instead of pointing to the front? Could it be that her husband was shot  in the front of his head and not the back as she initially reported? Could it be that she was possibly the shooter and not the alleged pirates or teenagers or whomever has him?

Then as she says she is there to honor her husband, we see her leak out an interesting signal of deception. She shakes he head NO in the negative while she says this. Is she really there to honor  her husband orto honor her own 15 more minutes of fame?


I also don’t  buy into the fact that there was an alleged eye witness who has now come forward with the  claim he saw the man’s panicked wife as she fled to the American side of the lake. He doesn’t say that he saw  the man who was allegedly shot.He doesn’t say that he saw exactly what happened. And how close was he to her in order to see her teaars and sobbing?

He said “ The way I saw her come around it looked like something terribly wrong happened. I mean, she was jittery, frantic. … She was crying, sobbing.”

Why was she crying an sobbing? Was she crying and sobbing because she hd just killed her husband and life as she knew it was now over?   The fact that the witness spoke in shadow and with voice alteration to avoid identification because he said he feared for his life is also disturbing to me.



If someone has nothing to hide they will not only insist on taking a polygraph. they will even offer up blood or hair samples. So the fact that she uses the word “may” and is hesitant is cause for concern. There are  so many inconsistencies in her story that a  polygraph test  test could validate.

But we  don’t need a polygraph test to confirm that something doesn’t seem  right here. www.