ASSAD’S BODY LANGUAGE AND VOICE ON BBC IN RESPONSE TO NOT HAVING CHEMICAL WEAPONS SHOWS HIS MANY SIGNALS OF DECEPTION

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 3.18.18 PM.pngWhen someone begins a statement with “So” it is not a got sign in the telling the truth department.  His looking down is also a red flag in terms of being honest and forthright.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad  says “we don’t have any chemical weapons” and says this in a monotone with a glottal fry as he dies off at the end of his statement which is usually a major signal of deception,

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 3.23.15 PM.png

He then gets really breathy and his breathing changes as he says “we gave up our arsenal two years ago.”. This is also a signal of deception in most cases. As he says this he looks down and you can see the visible change in his respiration as he uses more upper chest breathing.

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 3.26.50 PM.png

He says even if r had them we wouldn’t use them ( said in an unemotional montone) , he then says UH ( another signal of deception in this contexts) as he says he have never used UH our chemical arsenal in our history. His head is cocked to the side as you see here which is also often  signal of deception considering the context. His voice is breathy and waivering and not solid as one’s voice would be if they were being forthright in denying chemical attacks.

When asked by the interviewer what happened, he doesn’t make sense. He says “as I said” but he didn’t say .. Then he blames it on Al Qaeda.

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 4.23.04 PM.png

With head still cocked to the side and monotone low intensity and low volume speech pattern, he covers himself for liable as he says It is our impression that the West – the United States is hand and glove with the terrorists. As he says this there is a mono-expression which means no emotion and no reaction on his face. And then he raises his eyebrows which means he is doubting what he has just said which is a signal of deception

He continues to die off at the end of his sentences and is barely audible which is yet another signal of deception. He continues to cover himself by saying “that is what we believe .” He doesnt accuse, he just gives his opinion so legally he can’t get into hot water.

He says that the US made this up as a pretext and “that is what ‘we” believe.” He says it is propaganda and thereas no investigation. As he says this he is still monototne and dies off at end.

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 4.30.45 PM.png

Now look at his body language,turned inward His  toes  are turned inward whichin dicates insecurity on his part which is also reflected in his tone and voice pattern and his fingers are interlocked as he gestures.

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 4.34.40 PM.png

You also see a shoulder shrug which further indicates deceptive movement as he continues to point the finger at Al Qaeda.And he begins his next statement with a long EHHHHH sound which does not do much for his credibility in my view.

“About the attack it is not clear whether it happened or not”, says Asad. He dies off at the end as he says this which is a signal of deception.

He also shows the back of his hand as she gestures which can also bee seen as a signal of deception along with his barely audible voice which speaks volumes to me.

He then says we don’t know if it   happened or not as you  can’t tell since there are so many “fake videos” out there  on the internet now. He says they are Al Qaeda who shave their beard wore white hats and appeared as humanitarian  heroes which is not the case. As eh says this he strugs his shoulder.

He also questions of the children were really children of that area or if they were dead at all. The then asks who committed the attack if there was an attack?

The fact that he is asking questions, instead of giving answers concerns me.  When people ask a myriad of questions as opposed to giving facts, it is often suspect and leads one to believe they are not  being forthright.

He says you have no information at all as he shrugs his shoulders. Well since he is being accused, why not get some information and show proof that he didn’t do it as he said. But by asking questions and pointing the finger and speculation it makes one further dowt Assad’s veracity  of what he is saying and credibility.

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 4.47.36 PM.png

At the end he gets defensive and puts his hand between his legs indicating that he is feeling vulnerable in doing this gesture. He gestures with his palms to him and that is also not a good signal as far as being truthful is concerned in my estimation.

Screen Shot 2017-04-14 at 4.49.38 PM.pngAnd finally what really makes me believe he is not being forthright is that when he is asked if he thinks this is a fabrication, looks down and shakes his head no when he should be shaking it yes as he relies, :”Definately, a 100 percent  and stammers on the words huh hundred percent. His voice and tone is also disturbing to me in that it is too monotone and he is way too inaudible

In order to get a baseline of how Assad sounded earlier in his speeches, his voice appeared strong and audible and his gestures were more formidable and forceful. So that leads me to believe he knows a lot more than he is saying in the interview to the BBC.

Advertisements

Casey Anthony’s Revealing Voice In AP interview Shows Shows Signals of Deception, Arrogance, Annoyance, and Hostility

 

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 9.19.55 AM.pngWhen asked how Caylee died she quitely and quickly  and in a breathy voice as she dies off at the end and says “I don’t know.”  To me that is a blatant signal of deception.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 9.43.36 AM.png

Then the reporter asks Something about drowning possibly. Casey  immediately turns arrogant in her tone and gets louder in volume and  says everyone has their theories and punctuates it with a monotonous I don’t know devoid of any emotion.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 9.46.40 AM.png She is asked so your parents had her. Her voice us up as if asking a question as she said “My did did?” To me that is a signal of deception.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 9.49.04 AM.pngWhen asked how did it play. She say I did what I was told. I don’t remember too much of what  ( and then she hesitates and stops for a second and says happened. which is another signal of  deception in my view.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 9.59.47 AM.png

When asked when things went wrong, he answer makes no sense. The reporter says ” IS that how it went” She says No  and there is a ( pause )  and then she slowly articulates “What I remember is my mom  coming in  before she went to work and saying goodby to us”.” AS she says this is sounds like she is putting a lot of effort into thinking about what she is going to say about this as she speaking time is slow. She then pauses. which is unnatural and says ” And then waking up several hours later.”

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 10.03.27 AM.png

And now we really see deception.  First she repeats exactly what the reporter says in parrot-like fashion. This is often a signal of deception n my view.”Several hours later” which she said is NOT “an hour or two hours” later as she now tells the reporter. So in essence she just lied as she now changed her story.  The reporter asks “Don’t you wish you know what happened.” Casey sounds very defensive in her tone as she says “Absolutely”.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 10.07.11 AM.png

What happens next, is totally nauseating as Casey says Caylee would be 12 this year.When the reporter asks what would she be like, Casey projects her own rebellious attitude  at tat age and hostility on to Caylee as she says ” total- bad ass asn laughs and even goes so far as to describe the type of music the dead child would be listening to is she were alive.- classic rock and says how she would be playing sports and “not takin’ shit from anyone.” This is Casey’s projection and idealization of herself, which she clearly projected onto her dead daughter.

She now lives and works with the private investigator on her defense team Patrick McKenna. She then defensively says how she doesn’t care about what people think of her but the revealing part is when she says I sleep ” and then she pauses  for a second as she continues with pretty good at night.” to me that is a signal of deception as one wonders if she really does sleep pretty good at night when deep deep down in her subconscious she knows what happened to her dead daughter.

Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 10.17.37 AM.png

What makes me further think this is deception is when she showed off Caylee’s a finger painting artwork to the interviewer and openly sobbed. Unike during her interview. she obviously she feels emotion about Caylee, and maybe that emotion is guilt and remorse for what she allegedly did to Caylee.

 

 

 

 

Nancy Pelosi Body Language- Hypocrisy, Anger, Deception Busted About Russia

screen-shot-2017-03-03-at-10-21-49-am

This is political  hypocrisy at it’s finest. Right after Nancy Pelosi’s accusations against Republicans over Jeff Sessions’ alleged meetings with the Russian ambassador, she showed some revealing body language which shows there is clearly more than meets the eye as far as Nancy Pelosi is concerned as she did the same the same thing  as Sessions when she was asked a similar question. Since the body doesn’t’ lie, Pelosi’s body language says it all and it looks to me like she was taken aback. Does she herself have something to hide?

screen-shot-2017-03-03-at-10-31-02-am

Politico reporter Jake Sherman directly asked Pelosi “You’ve been in Congress a little bit and you’re in leadership, have you ever met with the Russian ambassador?’

Pelosi was shocked!  this was revealed in her immediate awkward silence which took much longer than a person who had nothing to hide answering the question.  Pelosi  phumfered “Not with this Russian ambassador, no,” before  she quickly tried to change the subject and move on. When you put the word “no” at the end of a sentence, there is often trouble brewing. When you are being open and forthright you say No at the beginning of the sentence and then go on to explain. So immediately it put a huge red flag up for me.

Thne she explains herself. When you give an open honest answer you don’t explain and sound defensive  and have a catch in your tone. Then Sherman asked “Is it normal to meet with ambassadors?” and her reply was “Yeah,” She did not says “yes it certainly is, or yes or yes it is. She blurted out a yeah.

Her body language also  seemed to me to scream many signals of deception.

screen-shot-2017-03-03-at-10-21-49-amFirst she shows the back of her hand which is the first bad signal.It shows she is shocked at the question as she looks away.

screen-shot-2017-03-03-at-10-22-12-amThen she holds up her finger as to admonish and subconsciously  and angrily say, “don’t ask me this question”. She doesn’t even look at Sherman but give him an askance glance which illustrates anger.

screen-shot-2017-03-03-at-10-28-07-am

Then she closes her eyes as if not to deal with the question- to shut it out literally. She also reaches for her throat which is the most vulnerable part of your body. It is a form of self protection and means she is feeling really vulnerable at this question being thrown at her.

Screen Shot 2017-03-03 at 10.24.56 AM.pngNo here she is super angry as she makes a karate chop gesture as you can see the movement of her hand which is caught in the photo.She also looks away as she can’t even face the interviewer which is another bad sign. In essence her karate chop gestures says “cut it off.”

Screen Shot 2017-03-03 at 10.25.52 AM.pngShe is still showing the back of her hand and not the palms which is yet another red flag signal to me.  She also does not look at the interviwers which is yet another signal red flag moment.

Screen Shot 2017-03-03 at 10.27.20 AM.pngNow this is a very serious moment for me red flag wise as she shows how vulnerable she is now that she in essence got busted. She reaches for her vulnerable area- her throat region.

Screen Shot 2017-03-03 at 10.27.59 AM.pngNow her facial expression really shows how angry and upset she is that she got “caught with her pants down” so to speak. She is no dummy when it comes to the game of politics and she knows the repercussions of this question and her mind is spinning at 100 miles per hours to see how she can now spin her answer to look good to the public. The hand on the throat which remains is now even more telling when matched with her upset facial expression.

Screen Shot 2017-03-03 at 10.28.07 AM.pngNow she can no longer face her interviewers and shuts down with closed eyes and cups her hand over her vulnerable throat area into a fist indicating she wants to shut out what just happened and she is angry about it as revealed by the fist like posturing of her hand.

So there you have it- one politician call the kettle black when her pot is just as black. This my fans and friends and readers is why I detest politics. It is full of these lies, these games, and this hypocrisy which we have just seen. It is why I support no party over the other and no candidate over the other. It is why I am impartial and neuutral because they both end up doing and saying the same thing at one time or another. So it is a waste of time to keep it all straight as far as I am concerned.

Politics is a game as we  just saw and it is a very serious and dangerous game. It is about besmirching one to others and vice versa. So if you ever dare to accuse me of being partisan or representing one candidate over another I will refer you to this Pelosi blog I just did.

 

Donna Brazile Shows Multiples Signals of Deception in Megyn Kelly Interview

When someone uses that many UH’s UH’s UH’s as Donna Brazile did, when addressing an issue,rest assured there is an issue here. Here is a link to the videotape of the interview 

https://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/blogs/news/watch-megyn-kelly-destroys-donna-brazile-after-debate-full-video

Look at 5:58 when Megyn Kelly busts her for releasing a debate question verbatim

Screen Shot 2016-10-22 at 1.36.08 PM.png

Brazile  doesn’t act surprised or outraged. I nstead she smiles, cocks her head to the side and nods her head yes and then makes a preamble ” I will be straight up with you” as she denies supplying the question and getting it from CNN which may all be signals of deception.

When Megyn point blank asked her where she got it we see more UH’s and UH’s as she is literally taken aback by the question as she raises her shoulders, stammers, repeats more UH UH UH’s and answers a question with a question.

In my view all of these multiple body language tells all point to signals of deception on Brazile’s part. So there may be a big possibility that she or those close to her may have provided the questions to the Hillary prior to the debate in my view based on what I have seen Brazile do in this interview.

Is Ryan Lochte A Sociopath? Lame Apology May Give Insight

Screen Shot 2016-08-14 at 8.20.46 PM

One of the most difficult things to spot is when a Sociopath is lying. When Ryan Lochte gave his interviews with Billy Bush, he was fluid and fluent. He had no ums or uhs in his speech and no other vocal tells of deception. Physcially there were no body language tells either, .to indicate that he lied. While there was one story that caused a little raised eyebrow as  he told Billy- that the robber asked him to give him his money and  Ryan told the robber  “no,”  it could be dismissed as a carryover of the gold medalist’s brazen fearless attitude that he showed in the Olympic pool. When asked to give over their money, most  people would give it readily, especially if there was a gun involved in any way. Other than that statement, Ryan showed a calm, collected attitude as he shared the story with Bush.

 

Screen Shot 2016-08-18 at 9.24.56 AM

It was only when Matt Lauer interviewed him and the story changed from the gun being “pointed  at his head “ to the gun being “pointed in his direction” it was clear that Ryan was a liar.

At first, no one wanted to believe Ryan would lie about this. It made sense that he would have been robbed, considering the fact that Rio has the highest crime rate and robberies are rampant. In addition, why would Ryan make this up? He certainly didn’t need attention .  After all, he was a Gold medalist and was getting loads of attention. So why would he make  something like this up?

One reason he would make this up  may possibly be that he may perhaps have sociopathic tendencies. Sociopaths have a tendency to invent outrageous lies about their experiences. They wildly exaggerate and make up things to the point of absurdity, but when they describe it to you in a storytelling format, for some reason, it sounds believable at the time.That is exactly the case with Ryan, especially with his story about saying “no” to the robber. 

Sociopaths are also incapable of apologizing and feeling remorse. Only because the other athletes he was with were forced to  come clean, essentially “busting” Ryan, Lochte gave a public apology. It wasn’t verbal. It was written  on instragram. If Lochte didn’t make a statement he would be in further danger with his sponsors and with the IOC.

The apology speaks volumes about Ryan. It begins by saying I apologize for not being more careful and candid in how I described the events. he doesn’t say he apologizes for lying but rather for not being careful. In essence, he is saying that his only remorse is getting caught. This is typical sociopathic rhetoric as they are not direct with their apologies and couch them in a way to deflect  the seriousness of what they did.

He also says that he apologizes for taking the attention away from his fellow athletes. This is not what he needs to be sorry for. He needs to be sorry for making up a lie about Brazil, who already has a terrible reputation when it comes to robberies and crime. He needed to apologize for adding fuel to the fire, yet he doesn’t do so.

Since Sociopaths never truly apologize because they feel they  are never wrong, they also never feel guilt. If they are forced to apologize like Ryan was they will go on the defensive, In the next paragraph of Lochte;s apology, He blames the a. language barrier  and still insists that a gun was pointed at him  and money was demanded to let him leave, But he doesn;t say that he and his fellow swimmers broke the bathroom door and they security guard wanted them to pay for it. He didn’t say that the payment was a mere 50 something dollars.

Then Lochte demonstrates yet another signal of the sociopath;s behavior in his apology when he tries to lay on the charm and kiss up to those he needs. In Lochte’s case it was the International Olympic Committee, and the United States Olympic Committee.He gives a kiss up shout out to them as he knows what may be in store for him, They could potentially go as far as banning him if they see fit, for his lies and causing an international incident in an already flamable situation.

Finally he encourages people to move on and to essentially forget about what he did as he says he “looks ahead to celebrating future successes.

This may be wishful thinking on Lochte’s part. He has damaged his public image forever. People are not quick to forget when another one of their hero’s let them down with all of his lying behavior- Lance Armstrong. They are certainly not going to let Lochte off the hook so easily. This has severely damaged his brand due to his issues with credibility.

 

While Lochte showed no signals of deception in Billy Bush interview, he is inconsistent in Matt Lauer interview indicating deception

Screen Shot 2016-08-18 at 9.24.56 AM.pngWhen Ryan Lochte told Billy Bush that he was robbed in an interview in Brazil, he did not exhibit any signals of deception. There was no stuttering or hemming and hawing. There were no body language signals to indicate that he was being anything other than truthful. The story also sounded plausible but there was one part when Ryan said that the robber told him to give him his money and he said no, that seemed odd to me. I didn’t take issue with it because after winning a gold medal and feeling on top of the word and invincible, it would seem plausible that an Olympian might say something like that an even defy a robber.

But when she spoke to Matt Lauer over the phone in an off the record conversation, there was cause for concern. Unlike his interview with Billy Bush whether he said that the gun was pointed at his head, he told Matt that the fun was pointed in his direction. This makes me question whether Ryanis telling the truth.

In analysing deception, the more information you have, the more certain you can be as to whether someone is telling the truth or not . In Ryan’s mind perhaps he  come to believe that this is the truth – that he was robbed based on the fact that he was allegedly drunk. Perhaps that was his reality as there was a  guard armed with a pistol. In his mind he may have come to believe that the gun was aimed at him, which accounts for his lack of deceptive signals to Billy Bush.

Apparently there was an altercation at a gas station n Rio as Lochte, along with fellow swimmers Jack Conger, Gunnar Bentz and Jimmy Feigen, stopped at a gas station in  a suburb of Rio where many Olympic venues are located. One of the swimmers tried but failed to open the door of an outside bathroom.

Apparently several  swimmers  pushed on the door and broke it. A security guard appeared who was armed with a pistol, never took it out or pointed it at the swimmers. The swimmers were then asked to pay for the broken door and left.

Perhaps in Lochte’s mind, the fact that he was out some money for the payment of the door, translated into his inebriated mind as being robbed.

His seeing the gun and then feeling as though he was robbed by having to pay for the door) may have angered him and created an exaggerated  scenario in his mind that the gun was pointed at him and that he was robbed and out money.

Screen Shot 2016-08-18 at 9.46.55 AM.png

When swimmers Conger and Bentz  were pulled off a plane going back to the United States they admitted that the robbery story had been fabricated.

The fact that Lochet is sticking to his guns and now has an attorney spokesman speaks volumes. It says that he may indeed believe the story in his own mind that a gun was pointed at him by a police officer who in reality was a security guard, he may also be sticking to his guns in order to save face and not lose endorsement as no one likes a liar to represent their product. We are talking about millions of dollars here. So if Ryan comes clean and brands himself a liar it is a no win situation. The final scenario is that he is a sociopath who is so cool, calm, and collected in his lies that he sounds believable.

In any event, this is a very embarrassing situation for Lochte and is something that will follow him forever. Even if he is telling the truth which based on this additional information I no longer believe based on the Matt Lauer interview as well as new information which has surfaced, he will be branded as a liar.

 

 

Joyce Mitchell Who Helped Prisoners Escape Shows Multiple Signals of Deception and Delusion of Being “Too Nice”

 Screen Shot 2015-09-18 at 9.24.27 AM

When someone shakes their head no and says they are  sorry for everything they did,  when they are supposed to be shaking their head in the affirmative position, you can rest assured that they are not very sorry about what they did.

She says that she did what she did in helping prisoners Richard Matt and David Sweat escape because he was trying to help her family. As she says this her voice dies off at the end which is often a signal of deception, especially in this context.

Screen Shot 2015-09-18 at 9.31.53 AMShe also repeats Matt Lauer of the Today Show’s answer when she say It is fair to say we became friends as she looks down. She is really indicating that they were more than friends as her body language indicates deception.

She has justified her actions in getting involved with these Toxic criminals who committed heinous crimes by stating that “she is too nice”. She said that people constantly tell her she is “too nice”. To me, she is parroting what her defense lawyer must have used to defend her. There is NOTHING nice about helping a criminal who cut his boss’ body up into little pieces or helping a criminal who killed a police officer. She is living in an illusion when she says this.

She says that she gave Matt the tools she requested because she told her that he loved her. She said she answered him with I love my husband. “As she says this she looks down. his makes no sense because if she loved her husband she wouldn’t be involved with Matt in the first place.

She also does what is known as “duping delight.”  She leaks out a smile as she tells about her ordeal.She is not sorry for what she did but is sorry that she got caught and now has to spend her time in prison.