Melania Trump- Communicate Anger Directly Not Passive Aggressively With Toxic  Message on Jacket

There is nothing more Toxic than being Passive Aggressive and expressing your anger in a sneaky way. That is what Melania Trump did when she wore a $39 Zara jacket with the  words ” I Really Don’t Care, Do You?

Screen Shot 2018-06-21 at 11.04.13 PM.png

There is nothing more Toxic than being Passive Aggressive and expressing your anger in a sneaky way. That is what Melania Trump did when she wore a $39 Zara jacket with the  words ” I Really Don’t Care, Do You?”

Communication wise I am not buying the Spin they are using to try to make it OK for Melania to wear this jacket with this toxic message on it’s back. It is a very passive-aggressive form of communication.

If it was a message to the press, as her spin doctors are saying, then why not wear it to a press conference? If it was against the press, it backfired on her. Instead, she wore it to a detention camp to meet migrant children.  It gives the message that she must really not care about the children, not the press.

Screen Shot 2018-06-22 at 12.06.29 AM.png

Personally, I think it was Melania’s message to the world that she is done- done caring about anyone or anything any more after her son was so verbally eviscerated by one-time actor and Jane Fonda’s bother,  Peter Fonda.  Something clearly must have gone wrong in the Fonda household to have both siblings be so full of hate. Peter Fonda tweeted that her beloved son Baron be ripped from her arms put in a cage with pedophiles. He is suffering no consequence unlike Roseanne Barr did by losing her show and her career. Apparently, Fonda is still having a movie released that he is appearing in from Sony Picture Classics.

Melania is furious and rightfully so. After all, she was the one who pleaded with her husband to reunite the children with their parents. She was the catalyst to make a good thing happen. She didn’t want to see children in cages emotionally distraught and desperate for their parents. She was a hero in all of this.

And then Toxic Peter Fonda unleashes the most vulgar tweet that was so vicious and frightening- so much so that she called in the Secret Service who no doubt paid Fonda a visit. Like a scared rat, he issued a frantic apology which was clearly forced. He also called for anarchy. At the least, he needs to be tried for trying to incite a riot and even treason. And he needs to be put in jail for threatening Melania and what he would do to Baron. And for those of you who claim this is Fonda’s  First Amendment right, I say threats like this have no rights.  And of course, nothing was done to him.

So maybe Melania had enough. That may have been the last straw that broke the camels back so to speak. Attacked so viciously and vulgarly, she may actually be saying to the world” I give up!”  ”  I don’t give a damn”  and finally ” I don’t really care about anything anymore.” ”  I don’t care about these migrant children after my son was eviscerated verbally.”

Screen Shot 2018-06-22 at 12.12.10 AM.png

The verbal attack on Baron may have been the lowest and final blow to her as a reluctant First Lady, to begin with.  So she took this opportunity to lash out in anger in a passive-aggressive way.

Instead of wearing this jacket ( which I love by the way if it didn’t have print on the back and if it was in a bright color like lime green or aqua or a shocking pink) she needed to speak directly to the people.

She needed to hold a presser and remind America and the world that she was working on their behalf to reunite the children and that there is no room for hate and hostility towards her or dragging her son into the equation. She needed to let haters know that there is no need for such vitriol as Peter Fonda did. She needed to call him out for this as well as the rest of the haters.

Whoever is advising her is doing a very poor job and didn’t do her any favors. In fact in the words of The Donald, that person or those alleged advisors need to be “fired. ”

Melania is angry and rightfully so.  But passive-aggressive communication is as  TOXIC as the vulgarities spewed upon her. Melania must speak up and say what is on her mind in a direct and open way,  not sneakily or passive aggressively.

Advertisements

FDNY Psychologist Has Both a Personal and Political Agenda vs Trump as She Calls Him “unfit for office”

First and foremost, unlike NY Fire Department contract psychologist, Suzanne Lachman, I have absolutely NO political or personal agenda against Trump or any politician for that matter. As a body language expert and journalist with a strong background in psychology, I report what I see and hear without bias. So when I saw that psychologist Lachman declared Trump “unfit for office” I saw someone who I believe is not acting professionally or ethically for that matter.

In fact, countless trained professionals both Republicans and Democrats have called for her to lose her license. They feel what she did was not only irresponsible but unethical. As a licensed professional in the field of psychology, she cannot use her profession to discuss anyone she has not treated or make defamatory statements about their ability to serve in office or not. She can report traits she observed, but it is not her professional place to draw any conclusions about how fit one is or is not to be in office. This is going over the line.

Lachman is saying that because she had a contract with the Fire Department  of New York, she felt qualified to make the call about Trump. The logic in this seems extremely flawed. In fact, the FDNY just sent out a notice that they are distancing themselves from Lachman and from her tweets. In fact, Frank Gribbon, a spokesman for FDNY, told the Post Lachmann’s tweets should not be associated with her work for the Department.‘It’s inappropriate to cite her work with FDNY in social posts that express political views,’ he said.

Upon further investigation, it is clear that Lachman’s rant against Trump is both political and personal.  Below is a screenshot of Lachman’s political bias reflected in her Facebook pages. She shows how she is pro Welcoming Refugees and shows how she is a huge fan of Obama as she posts a photo of Obama shaking hands with a janitor, as well as a photo of Trump in an unflattering pose which is clearly photoshopped.

Screen Shot 2018-06-17 at 11.53.10 AM.png

Apparently, she is also a  part of  Rosie O’Donnel’s minion ( Trump’s arch enemy)  which she posted on her FB account. Thus, she may very well be involved in raising money or participating in a documentary where she will state that Trump has dangerous psychological disorders as you see below.

 

Screen Shot 2018-06-17 at 12.06.18 PM.png

And finally, her rant against Trump goes far beyond political, it is very personal with her, as she shows a billboard of Trump with a bird shitting on Trump’s head. That is not professional or even political. It is personal. 

Screen Shot 2018-06-17 at 12.06.32 PM.png

In fact,  Lachmann said that she met Trump back in 1992  (26 years ago)  when she stated that she introduced herself to him at a social event. She says that he said to her” Why would I want to talk to you? I wouldn’t even let you suck my dick.”

First of all, he may or may not have said this.  But let’s say he did say this. I seriously doubt he said it in one sentence at the same time. The first response  “Why would I want to talk to you?” was most likely in response to something said to him first. Then a more severe response  “I wouldn’t even let you suck my dick” was most likely a  severe response to something negative that was definitely said to him first. Trump is a responder, not an initiator. He doesn’t begin it. Instead, he finishes it.

As we ALL know, NOTHING happens in a vacuum. There is always a stimulus and a response to every situation. I seriously doubt that Trump would make those comments unprovoked, based on everything we know about him in terms of what he has demonstrated publicly all these years.

For instance, his infamous “grab em by the pussy comment” was not made in thin air with no stimulus to provoke his admission that he feels that this is what you can do to women when you are a celebrity. Instead, it was stimulated by very immature, macho, showing off, bravado to impress former entertainment reporter Billy Bush. If Billy was silent and had not instigated the conversation, Trump would most likely not have mentioned this at that particular time.  So if you carefully examine the dynamic of the  Billy Bush and Donald Trump pussy grabbing conversation, there was a stimulus-response and action-reaction going on.

Similarly, there was no doubt a  stimulus-response and action-reaction going on in his communication with  Suzanne Lachman.  She makes it a point to  mention that she met him in 1992 “right after his divorce from Ivana.” 

In doing this statement analysis, she doesn’t say “I met him in 1992” or “in the early 90’s”. Instead, she qualifies it with the statement “right after his divorce from Ivanka.” She also says it was a “social event” which leads one to question whether she was making her move towards the newly single available Donald Trump.

Seeing that Lachmann is no shrinking violet and rather aggressive media-wise, it may be that she was equally aggressive in her interaction with Trump and perhaps she let him know she was interested in him on a personal level. Maybe Trump tried to let her down gently to let her know he wasn’t interested or maybe not.

With no intention of looks shaming Lachmann, she is clearly not Trump’s type based on his history of dating perfect body, nose, and teeth fashion models and Playboy Playmates. Perhaps Lachmann didn’t take the hint and kept persisting until he may have been crass and rejected her outright by letting her know that he dates models and Playmates only.

This may have both embarrassed and upset Lachmann, which may have possibly led her to make a disparaging comment to Trump in order to help her assuage her hurt feelings towards his initial rejection of her.   It seems she may have possibly retaliated with a response that would be something like ”  I would never want to go to bed with you” or taking it to the extreme, she may have even said to him  “You probably have a small dick”  or “Fuck you”.

Now we ALL know that when a disparaging comment is made to Trump, he claps back even harder. He doesn’t instigate. Instead, he retaliates and he retaliates not with a hammer but with a submachine gun. He even mentions this in “Art of the Deal” and in all of his books and in public interviews. We have also seen it first hand when Marco Rubio started with him saying that Trump had little hands, to which Trump coined him ” Little Marco”. Most recently when Robert DeNiro publicly at the Tony Awards said ” Fuck Trump”, Trump clapped back calling him “Punchy DeNiro”- as in “punch drunk”. He did the same to Maxine Waters who called for his impeachment, He immediately responded and  called her “Low Intelligence Maxine.” “Dishonest Hillary” came about from Clinton’s personal attacks as did negative monikers for anyone who started with him. 

So based on Trump’s pattern of behavior, it seems highly plausible that Suzanne Lachmann made a negative remark directly to Trump, most likely concerning  something related to his  sexuality in order to make hersef feel better and  to mollify her rejection ( like “I wouldn’t want to sleep with you because you probably have a little dick” or  “Suck it” ” You’re uch a dick” or “Fuck you’  or something to that effect) This, in turn,  may have caused him to retaliate in sexual terms and even more vulgarly by stating to her” I wouldn’t let you suck my dick.”

There had to be a hostile sexual exchange of words between these two as nothing happens in a vacuum. It seems highly plausible that she started with him by saying something nasty or derogatory and he simply finished it in his Trump way.

Screen Shot 2018-06-17 at 11.12.59 AM.png

Now she is using her position Psychologist and using the NYPD Fire Department to add to her credibility to retaliate and have the last word to trash Trump publically. But what she failed to realize is that she trashed herself as “hate consumes the hater.”
This will all backfire on her as s it already has, The FDNY has distanced themselves from her so I doubt they will be renewing any contracts with her. And she will no doubt be under investigation by her licensing board and may very well lose her license to practice psychology. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OJ Body Language and Speech Leak Out Truth- He Loved Paula Barbieri, Loved and Hated Nicole, and HE DID IT!

Screen Shot 2018-03-11 at 9.34.57 PM

In watching OJ’s 2006 interview with his then publisher Judith Reagan of his book “If I Did It”  OJ was telling the truth based on his body language and speech content. He did     it ! There were three main signals of deception. The first one was when he said, Nicole fell. The second was when he said he cut his finger on a glass, and the third was when he said he loved Nicole as he shook his head no.

TRUTH- HE LEAKS OUT CONFESSION HE DID IT

The interview was incredibly revealing because not only did he admit he did it by going from saying “hypothetically” to switching over to “I”,  he showed no signals of deception when speaking of the murders. He was fluid and fluent and his voice was strong and unwavering.  there were no extraneous body language or facial language or vocal tells to indicate he was lying. He spoke with conviction. So he was indeed telling the truth about the murders. he was way too detailed for it to be hypothetical as well. In essence, he told the truth about how he killed Nicole and Ron Goldman.

SIGNALS OF DECEPTION

He lied when he said Nicole fell down. You hear a dismissive tone in his voice after going from such a strong voice with conviction. He also looks away and makes facial grimaces when he says that this is all hypothetical. At times he laughs. This clearly indicates deception- that it was not hypothetical but the truth.

He was also dismissive when he talks about the glass breaking. His eyes shift and his tone of voice changes. No one holds a glass and then it suddenly breaks in your hand. Also, he was way too detailed when telling the story. That is a clear signal of deception.

Then the third signal of deception was when he spoke of Nicole and said he “loved that girl” as he shook his head no. While his words were sweet, his body language betrayed him. He didn’t love her. He hated her and was angry at her and that is why he killed her.

ANGER

He not only expressed anger at Nicole when he yelled at her grave and said “I told you” it was revealing. He told her he would kill her and he did. He is blaming her for his having to kill her- blaming her for her own death. He is angry at her now that Sydney does not have a mother and is angry about the impact not having a mother it will have on Sydney.  He showed no remorse -only anger towards Nicole. He was angry that she had other men over to the house when the kids were there. He was angry that she was hanging out with people whom he didn’t approve. In essence, he hated her for having a mind of her own and for no longer being able to control her as he did when she was 18.

He was also angry at Ron Goldman and revealed disdain in his voice and facial expression at the fact that he was challenged by Ron.  When OJ said you think you could fight me as  Ron stood up to OJ and attempted to use his karate moves on OJ, OJ  dismissed Ron’s action. He was saying Ron was no match for him- a little peon. But truth be told, Ron could have harmed OJ with his karate, but OJ’s knife was no match for Ron’s karate moves. He expressed his extreme anger at Ron Goldman for daring to stand up to OJ. He also was angry at Ron for showing up that night. When Ron explained he was there to return Nicole’s mother’s glasses, OJ dismissed it by saying he didn’t know if it was true or not. OJ’s account of Ron Goldman proves that Goldman did not die in vain. He died a hero defending an abused woman. He, unfortunately, turned out to be collateral damage.

He was also angry that the public thought of him as a murderer. In fact, he made a facial contortion and pursed his lips and quietly said the word murderer- something he knew he was. Then he is angry at the press and says how they are responsible for his negative image and how the  public actually  loves him and asks him for his autograph,

NARCISSISM

It seemed that his most meaningful and proud moment was when he saw people lining up on the freeway during his Bronco chase with signs saying OJ GO- or We LOVE YOU OJ. Throughout the interview, his stating how people love him was a was a common theme. He was more interested in people liking him and people accepting him and how he would look to others, than what happened to Nicole and Ron. Now the world has seen in action, up close and personal, what an extreme malignant narcissist looks and sounds like. There is no emotion when it comes to anyone else but himself.

HIS LOVE FOR PAULA

Screen Shot 2018-03-12 at 7.39.08 AM

When OJ spoke of Paul Barbieri, he spoke of her lovingly. He was smitten with her and I know that up close and personal.  You see, before the murders until up until the day of the murders, I was very close friends with Paula. So, when he spoke about her, I knew what he was saying was truthful. This is based on knowing Paula and hearing about OJ from her directly. When he said that it upset Paula that Nicole wanted to be back in the picture and get back with him, that was true. In fact, Paula became well aware that OJ was seeing both her and Nicole and that upset Paula so much that  so she wanted out of the relationship.

I first met Paula when she was dating my former client turned friend- Dolph Lundgren. In fact,  she and Dolph double dated several times- me with me and my  Federal Court Judge boyfriend at the time.   After she and Dolph ended their relationship, Paula then became a model. She and I ended up becoming very good friends, going to social functions, movies,  hanging out at one another’s homes, going shopping together, attending barbecues at her at her house,  attending formal dinner parties at my house. When she started dating OJ, we only hung out whenever  OJ was out of town as otherwise, the two were inseparable.

One day, Paula picked me up outside of my office to go out for lunch in a huge white SUV. I asked her why she bought such a large car. She then told me it wasn’t hers- it was OJ’s and he let her drive it whenever he was out of town. So Paula drove us to lunch in OJ’s infamous white Bronco before it became infamous.

 

Screen Shot 2018-03-12 at 7.54.50 AM

 

As Paula and OJ’s relationship became more serious I grew more concerned for her. The reason was that I once had a client who was a male model who used to model with Nicole for a fur company. He shared with me that on their photo shoots the company was always having to hide Nicole’s bruises with makeup because OK beat her and often left marks on her.

I  also personally heard about the cops coming to OJ’s house for beating Nicole, from an actual cop friend who shared the details with me. So knowing about OJ’s other side left me concerned for Paula. That is why I asked her point blank if he very hit her or abused her. She assured me that he did not.

Like OJ said in his interview which was truthful, Nicole began to call  OJ repeatedly and profess her love for OJ even though they weren’t together for 8 or 9  months. That is when OJ told about Nicole showing up to his house with his kids unexpectedly. Being the small town that Hollywood and Beverly Hills and the surrounding areas are,   Nicole got wind of the fact that Paula and OJ were getting very serious and talking marriage.

So Nicole would constantly call OJ, which upset Paula, which she relayed back to me. She could see how  Nicole was trying to manipulate OJ and use the kids to get him back and rekindle their relationship. Paula knew OJ was seeing Nicole when she wasn’t in town and knew he was having a dual relationship with both she and Nicole. So Paula finally decided to break up with him.  But first, she wanted to go to a special Black Tie affair with him which she did two days before the murders,  The next day, she left for  an out of town on a modeling gig. I don’t know whether or not she tried to break up with him in person the night of the black-tie affair or if she did over the phone with him, or if she even broached the subject of breaking up with him at all. That remains a mystery to this day.  I will never know what happened as I never spoke to Paula since the day OJ killed Nicole. When I saw Paula plastered all over the news and standing by her man- OJ it sickened me. I lost all respect for her as I knew that she was trying to cash in on her 15 minutes of fame, which is what she did by getting a three million dollar book deal on a vapid book that said nothing.

OJ’S LOVE-HATE RELATIONSHIP WITH NICOLE

Screen Shot 2018-03-12 at 7.53.55 AM

I do believe that OJ loved Nicole when she was an 18-year-old waitress at the Daisey in Beverly Hills when she looked up to him and did whatever he said. But when she came into her own, he began to hate her and abuse her. He couldn’t stand that he lost control over her. That is when he began hitting her and abusing her.

He hated her seeing other men because that was final proof he had no control over her and it angered him. Her dating younger men angered him as did her associating with new girld friends. He still wanted to control who she saw and with whom she associated and reacted negatively to Faye Resnick, whom he called a whore after she  befriended Nicole.

He showed his anger as he relayed these issues on camera. while OJ was abusive to Nicole, like most abused women Nicole couldn’t let go and quit him and he couldn’t quit her. When she found out about Paula, she wanted him back with an urgency. When OJ found out about the younger men she was dating he became furious. So they both pushed one another’s buttons in the worst way possible until he killed her. So when OJ teared up at the end and said: “he loved that girl” he was correct and truthful as he loved the little 18-year-old girl. But as he said this, he shook his head “n:o which showed his ambivalence as he hated the woman Nicole had become.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Black Evening Gowns Made a Statement and Made Everyone Look Great at Golden Globes

While the memo at the Golden Globes celebration as to wear black as a sign of protest  against sexual harassment in  Hollywood, it also showed how wearing black evening wear can make just about everyone look great,  So many awards ceremonies have had hits and misses as far as fashion is concerned, But  at this years Golden Gloves everyone appeared to be a hit.  Here are some examples of how wearing black evening wear can make you look even better,

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 6.12.28 PMPenelope Cruise was radiant in the black lace long sleeve off the shoulder dress. This year so many wore longer sleeves which was not often seen in the past.

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 6.13.49 PM.png

Allison Janney looked awesome in this black butterfly cutout of a dress witht he white accents for the butterfly;s wings , It also may have made a statement about the rebirth of women in Hollywood in terms of power.

 

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 6.14.02 PM.png

Margot Robbie’s dress looked great on the upper part,  but on the bottom it was a bit heavy with the silver beading only at the waist which looked like an upside down heart. Perhaps that dress was selected to made a statement of an upside down heart indicating the sadness of what has been going on in Hollywood.

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 6.14.17 PM.png

Mariah Carey never looked better with this mermaid trumpet dress, The neck with the band across it looked like a statement was being made  which meant “No” as in no more sexual harassment , Nariah looked radiant in this black dress which seemed to have it all with see through ruching at body of the dress .

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 6.14.36 PM.png

Even though Hallie Berry was one of the few who wore a shorter dress it looked beautiful in black like with thicker lace in strategic parts of the dress. Iy would have been even more beautiful if it was longer. Another thing I notice was that the makeup on so many was no as heavy as we have seen in other awards ceremonies. perhaps that was a statement as well.

Screen Shot 2018-01-08 at 5.37.46 AMWhile Francis McDormand wore practically no make up at all

Screen Shot 2018-01-08 at 5.38.49 AM

Reece Witherspoon wore subtle makeup in her stunning off teh shoulder black dress with little train.

Screen Shot 2018-01-08 at 5.44.32 AM.png

Even those who were made up like Nichole Kidman had more natural  looking makeup.

Screen Shot 2018-01-08 at 5.35.25 AM.pngMary K Blide looked outstanding with her black and one sleeved sliver sequin  gown with silver on he side, The other arm arm looked like she was wearing jewelry on her arm but it was the beauty of this dress.  Her lipstick was soft and natural looking that enhanced her beauty. He gown and her look was my favorite of the evening.

Screen Shot 2018-01-08 at 5.36.24 AM                                 And as far as accessories went the best accessory was Oprah’s glasses with  black sequins at the top of the glasses. The size of the glasses looked very flattering as well. Oprah;s makeup was subtle and brought out her best features while her black dress with boat neck also flattered her curvy figure.

This Golden Globes ceremony was very empowering in terms of what women said and how they presented themselves. It made a huge statement that there would be a big change in Hollywood and that women would no longer stand by and be victims of Hollywood’s sexual harassment.

Screen Shot 2018-01-08 at 5.58.41 AM.pngPerhaps the best statement was made by Barbara Streisand who was the only woman to with best Director. She told the audience that it was in 1984 and that we needed to step it up with more women directors. That made me feel particularly great since i am one of those new women directors with just having completed the rough cut of  my first documentary film .

Body Language Shows How Many Female Celebs Were Overly Affectionate and Flirtatious With a Then Powerful Harvey Weinstein

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 2.35.22 AM

 

 

 

NOTE: THIS POST IS NOT ABOUT BLAMING THE VICTIM AS THERE WERE MANY VICTIMS OF HARVEY WEINSTEIN. As we have now know, Harvey Weinstein has been accused of raping, harassing, and  abusing women throughout his reign as Hollywood’s most powerful mogul and starmaker. But as you can see from the body language in these photos  of  Harvey Weinstein with various female celebrities, there were those who were quite affectionate with him.  Many were even outwardly receptive and perhaps even leading the affections as you can see in some of the photos below.

Perhaps some  they played the “kiss up to Harvey to get ahead or stay working  game”,  “the Emperor has News Clothes when the Emperor is really Naked  game”, or perhaps they were  victims of Stockholm Syndrome where they identified with the perpetrator. Perhaps some were overly affectionate because they wanted to  be or remain in his good graces, star in hs next movie or do a business deal with him.

While many were late in the game to join in and denounce Harvey it is hard to believe that they didn’t know what he was really like. Everyone knew.  Hollywood is like any small town where everyone knows your business and what you are all about. They either chose to look the other way and ignore it, they knew and didn’t care, or they went along with it.

Whatever the case, you will see just how many celebs, who have now joined the bandwagon to denounce Harvey  were indeed singing a different tune about him earlier.

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 3.01.25 AMScreen Shot 2017-10-22 at 3.00.37 AM

Meryl Streep’s body language showed she really liked Harvey as she takes the lead and in an aggressive position has her arm engulfing him as she reaches over his chest to his arm. In the photo on the left she leans right into Harvey, whereas he is not leaning into her. Many feel it was too little too late when she denounced Harvey and now you can see why.

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 3.02.22 AM

Another latecomer to denounce Harvey is Judy Dench as she leans back in comfort as Harvey hugs her. Harvey also tells a story  on a Brittish talk show where  he says she  showed him her butt tattoo. That is pretty intimate. Was this her way flirting with Harvey and in turn keeping her working status with him as an older actress?

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 2.35.32 AMHeidi Klum certainly knew where her bread was buttered as Harvey chose her to be the host of Project Runway, which jumpstarted her career as a host and talent show judge so here she is kissing him, She is all over harvey with her hugs and kisses as she aggressively engulfs him and nuzzles up to him.

Oprah also is the one initiating a kiss to Harvey and  intiating a hug towards him as she  has done a lot of business with him. She doesn’t outright denounce him publically,  but instead calls what happened a “watershed moment.”

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 2.35.22 AM

In this photo  above, Rene Zellewegers arm is draped  strategically positioned between Harvey’s legs and she is way too comfortable around Harvey, which fueled many rumors that she actually slept with Harvey http://wild941.com/2017/10/13/renee-zellweger-sleep-harvey-weinstein-fame/  Perhaps that is why  now she has been lying low and keeping quiet about the Harvey scandal.

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 2.57.00 AM

Jennifer Lawrence leans into Harvey with an open mouthed  hearty flirtateous laugh as she ingratiates herself to Harvey.

While Jennifer now denounces Harvey and says she  is disturbed by him, she openly engaged with him in a flirtateous manner with head thrown back and was very receptive to him as you can see by her body language. She hugs him tightly and presses her chest into his body.

Screen Shot 2017-10-22 at 2.56.13 AMFor someone who complained about being threatened to wear his wife’s dress designs , Felicity Huffman seems pretty aggressive with her engulfing hug and leaning her body into Harvey.

These are just a few examples of the countless stars  who fawned over Harvey who then had the power to make or break their careers- even those who were already successful. Now they denounce him. Some say they never knew. But in such a small town where there are no secrets truth be told- everyone knew. It also makes you wonder how many female stars actually had sex with Harvey  or  allowed his shenanigans in exchange for a role or a career in order to get ahead  in one way or another.

It shows that the while the casting couch has certainly victimized many, in some cases that couch may have been used further one’s own career and status. Now I am not accusing any of these women above of doing so, but know that this may very well be  another side of the story for some of the women.

Harvey has proven to be a disgusting pig  who detests women and looks at it all as a sick game to fuel his perverted predatory needs as so many people can’t be making this up. In my view he needs to be in prison for what he did to so many people. But we cannot overlook that here is  also another dark side to this story. That side is that perhaps there were those women who knew about Harvey’s ways and tried to use it to their advantage to get what they wanted out of him as well. Once again.

Kathy Griffin Body Language Shows Fake Apology And Should NEVER Be Forgiven

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.30.19 AM.pngThere is absolutely NOTHING  funny about comedian Kathy Griffin’s showing a macabre shocking beheaded President  Trump with blood dripping down his face and matted into his blond hair . It’s one thing to disagree with Trump or his policies and to voice  opposition but this is unacceptable to do something like this. She  needs to be held accountable for her behavior forever and boycotted from all media, comedy venues and needs to be dealt with legally for inciting violence against the President.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.38.14 AM.png

Watching her pathetic hollow monotone apology was equally as repulsive.It is clear that she ONLY apologized because of the backlash which she openly admitted. Any apology that is made for that reason should never be accepted. Hers was not a true, heartfelt apology as she rolled her eyes and grimaced, Her Facial Language said” I;m forced to do this so that is the only reason I am apologizing. Look at her insincere facial expressions. There is  no remorse whatsoever.

The first phoney thing about her is her lack of makeup. This is a woman who is ALWAYS made up and for her to go without makeup shows how phony and contrived she is being.  Look at what she does with her lips. Its a defiant lip position which indicates she really doesn’t want to make this apology as it is not from her heart.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.39.58 AM.png

She says Hey everybody it’s me as she bows her head. This indicates that she is embarrassed by the negative feedback she received.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.43.43 AM.png

She says “I sincerely apologize” as she shakes her head “NO,” When you make a positive statement followed by negative body language like shaking your head “no: it is your body leaking out that you are not really apologizing.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.41.47 AM.png

She then closes her eyes as she says she apologizes which also indicates that she doesn’t want to really apologize. When someone honestly apologizes they open their eyes.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.46.12 AM.pngShe said “I am just now seeing the reaction of these images. ” As she says this she closes her eyes as to subconsciously not wanting to see how bad people’s reactions to her action s were. She doesn’t take responsibility as she says the “reaction of these images.” In essence she is distancing herself.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.48.33 AM.pngAnd here is the part where this Toxic Woman completely destroyed herself forever, She tries to make excuses by saying I’m a comic in order to appease herself and make it all right to show a beheaded President because she’s a comic.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 12.50.42 AM.png

Then this creature has the audacity to roll her eyes and says I crossed the line- I moved the line and then I crossed it. Her Facial Language shows that she is defiant and disgusted at having to apologize. It looks like a spoiled child rolling their eyes because they have to do something their mother told them to do that hy didn’t want to do.

then she shows how unapologetic she is as she says she realizes that the image “was disturbing.”WHAT???? The image was disturbing???? The fact that you could show a beheaded President of the United States that you have in essence murdered in effigy  is more disturbing.”But she does not address this as she obviously thinks there is nothing wrong with that. She just thinks it is wrong because the image of a bloody face and matted blood on the hair is disturbing.

Then  without apologizing this egomaniac says she” made a lot of mistaks” in her career and will continue to make them. Well here’s a  news flash Kathy, you will no longer make any mistakes in your career because it is essentially OVER!

When CNN is against you and your buddy Anderson Cooper chastises you and Chelsea Clinton who is a staunch supporter of her mother  Hillary and is always quick to criticize Trump, says it is a “no no” to joke about killing any President, you are doomed. Squatty Potty just fired you and I doubt if anyone will hire you as they will not want your “stink” on them. Even those celebs who are against Trump find your actions appalling. If CNN puts you on for New Years eve you can bet that CNN will be boycotted even more than it is already. They can’t afford to have you on any longer as their ratings are too low already.

TScreen Shot 2017-05-31 at 1.01.28 AM.png

And when you read a tweet that says:

Threats made against @SecretService protectees receive the highest priority of all of our investigations. #ProtectionNeverRests

— U.S. Secret Service (@SecretService) May 30, 2017

It means that the “head”  you are holding up detached from it’s body and dripping with blood  to indicate a death, may very well reflect  your own head as you have certainly killed your career forever.

Chuck Schumer Body Language Reveals Toxic Manipulation Dragging Refugees On Stage Phony Gestures, and Fake Tears

 

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 7.59.47 PM.png

He brings a handsome Syrian family on stage  with the women dressed in scarves and three cute children.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 8.01.02 PM.pngHe eyes the father. As he parades this “newly arrived family” of immigrants on stage, it seems very contrived and manipulative to me. It appears Schumer is doing this for his own agenda not for this family as they look traumatized being on stage.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 8.04.32 PM.pngAll children look sad and uncomfortable as you can see in the photo above.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 8.07.32 PM.png

As he reads his speech there is no emotion and no inflection as it appears to be a monotonous drone. There is no passion in the speech as she says that he is saying No to Trump’ executive order. He rarely looks up as he reads from his script.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 8.10.34 PM.png ASshe says so many are opposed to this order we see him raised his finger in a rehearsed manner that looks awkwards. It is an upward point which is not showing true anger. True anger would be shown by a direct point with finger extended and pointer lower  not upwards as he has it positioned.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 8.13.25 PM.png

He continues to sound boring and emotionless as he reads his script as he discusses the military.He then says something ridiculous that it makes lone wolves  are not so lone after all and their acts occur more not less. This  statement is nonsense as most lone wolves are usually beholden to some cause, doctrine , or group as they commit acts of terror.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.13.49 PM.pngHe does not seem upset at all facially throughout the speech as he even leaks out several smiles. This indicates that he appears to be enjoying his moment on stage.

Once again there is no vocal emotion as he speaks as she is saying negative things about Trump’s program.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.16.31 PM.png

He then refers to “the beauty of these people” which is so phony and contrived as he says it. It further validates that he is using ” these people” as props for his own agenda.He purses his lips for emphasis, after he says this which is further indication of his phoniness as this is  a conflicting facial gesture to what eh just said.

His phoniness continues as he stammers as he reads from his script and says let me tell you about this family. Clearly he is reading about this family and shows know emotion or no real knowledge of this family he is using as a political prop.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.21.36 PM.png

Asn he talks about the father he looks down as he continues to read about the man and awkwardly  seeks out the man’s shoulder in an attempt to show how much he cares about the man. It is blatantly contrived and phony and insincere.

Then he ridiculous slaps the poor man on thr shoulder in an aggressive gesture as eh said that the man came here because he translated for the Americans and got death threats for helping American soldiers. This is not some poor refugee that was injured or wounded in the war and left to die and rescued  he was an employee paid by Americans for his translation services for  whom he is serving and should very well be protected by his employer- the Americans. This is what is usually done and everyone knows it. yet Schumer is making it seem like this is some unusual case and that his man is some type of hero.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.29.16 PM.png

Schumer makes a  fist as he continues to exploit this poor man who doesn’t seem to happy with being paraded on stage and used as a prop as you can see by his facial expression. To further illustrate Schumer’s phoniness her doesn’t even look at the man. As he speaks he continues to stumble on his words, further indicating that he is manipulating and using this man to make his point.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.36.18 PM.png

Then he stumbles on the name of the next family he seeks to publicly exploit on stage. He rocks back and forth as he speaks indicating his discomfort and lack of sincerity. he then points upawrds  to the little girl maya who is 16  which makes her shirk away from him. The finger point is an angry gesture and the upward finger in the context in which he is using it is incongrous with what he is saying. This  further indicates how contrived and phony this is.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.40.29 PM.png

Then he points to Hamza and reads that  he turned 14 yesterday, Haza 8, and Hara 6 as he lays his hands on these two younger children which obviously makes the older  16 year old child feel uncomfortable as you can see by her expression ,

The Schumer bangs on the podium with his hand as he says the family arrived a month ago This would have been an angry gesture but there is no anger in his voice He then elks out a smile as he says their parents ( in laws) are American citizens.  So even though he is feigning anger his gestures and facial expression are totally inconsistent with the words he is saying which means he is being phony and manipulative. He even stammers and stumbles as he says what section  in the  Bronx the parents live.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.47.41 PM.png

He then uses another phy inconsistent gestures as he raises his hands and says that Trump wants us to believe that all  immigrants are terrorists when they are not but rather like these families. First of all Trump never said this and Schumer knows this . That his why one hand shows his fingers spread out and the other hand shows his fingers close together.If his gestures indicted honestly his hands would BOTH display  open  fingers in his gesturing.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 9.51.36 PM.png

He then leaks out as smile as he says they aren’t a threat to American but a promise to America. WE all know these people are not a threat to America and he knows it too. he also knows that these are not the people Trump is referring to in terms of being a threat to America. That is why Schumer leaks out a smile as an indication of dupid delight. he knows exactly what he is doing- being manipulative and trying to pull at people’s heartstrings by using this family. But it is not working as his phoniness belies him.

Then he looks down and taps two times on the podium which makes no sense.  he then looks down and fumbles through his papers as he reads a quote from the Old Testament ( Exodus) the  New Testament ( Matthew) and then he brings up a quote by Catholic comments  Pope Frances ( who in my view has no business sticking his two cents into politics especially when his own flock  of priests are a complete disaster with raping young children and destroying them forever.)As he reads what Pope Frances says he raises his awkward finger and says “This is the Pope speaking” As you can see from the expression the children’s faces they could care less. They are bored and can’t wait to get out of their and end their exploitation.

The Schumer embarrassingly invokes the name of his dead relative Ellis whom he was named after  who was named after Ellis Island. As she does this is  manipulative and corney behavior shows clearly.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 10.09.00 PM.png

Then for his final act he musters up a FAKE CRY with no tears as he calls trump mean spirited.

Screen Shot 2017-01-30 at 10.10.22 PM.png As you can see there are no dripping tears, He just held his eyes open without clinking which caused the to glisten. But it was NOT a real cry. if that was the case you would ee a downward turn in his mouth which was not evident.

And then we see what his real agenda is-  getting some press time and promoting himself as he mentions he is a Senator from NY and how he will fight and scrap with all of his being to overturn Trump’s directive.

The bottom line is that the cry was phony and his dragging these poor families on stage with him was contrived and manipulative to further his own agenda.