It is certainly acceptable to disagree with a candidate’s views on certain issues. It is also acceptable to express yourself passionately. But it is not acceptable to become verbally violent and commit verbal murder on a candidate because you disagree with them. Donald Trump being brutally and anally raped by a male character and then killed on an episode of South Park is not funny. There is nothing funny about being anally raped or killed. In fact close to three million men have in the United States have been victims of sexual assault and rape. That is not satire in my view. It is sick and highly disturbing. Comedy Central should never be allowed to air such a thing. In my view it has crossed the line.
Then to have a person on Meghan Kelly’s show on Fox News, Rick Lowry talk about Trumps “balls being cut off” is in my view grounds for never having this person on the airwaves again. It is unprofessional and unacceptable. In fact DonaldTrump tweeted about the matter by relaying that “Incompetent
@RichLowry lost it tonight on @FoxNews. He should not be allowed on TV and the FCC should fine him!”
As the host of the show, Megan Kelly’s body language showed that she acted like a school girl by tittering away and covering her eyes as she laughed. You can see in the photo above where there is a three shot of her Rich Lowry and the gentleman from the Blaze. While she is no fan of Donald Trump, she is still a host of a show and needed to act more professionally in my view. Instead of giggling and saying “What did you say?” to her vulgar guest and covering her eyes.
Instead,, she needed to reprimand Lowry and immediately tell him that his language was not acceptable to use on the air. The level of hatred towards candidates on both sides is frightening. It speaks volumes about how too many have become so desensitized that they have lost their humanity. There has to be some level of decorum and some boundaries which should never be crossed.
Once again this is not a political blog nor am I defending any particular candidate. I would say the same thing about any candidate who was discussed in such a Toxic manner where there were depicted as being raped or killed or had their genitals mutilated.
When confronted with the fact that she was married four times and had children in her adulterous relationships and whether or not she was a hypocrite, Kim Davis realizes she has been busted by the reporter. She cocks her head to the side and her eyes search to the right as she tries to come up with a response. Her response is that she is forgiven and “washed clean.”
In essence she is saying that those whom she refuses to give a marriage license to because they are gay are not clean and are in essence dirty.
She said that when she found God four years ago she couldn’t separate church from state. Well in my view, that is the time she needed to step down from her position as she was not effectively doing her job because one in any government position must be able to separate church from state. When the Supreme Court ruling came down, she needed to step away from her position since she could not separate church from state.
While she says that Godly authority trumps all other authority, she does realize that her constituents are the ones who elected her. As she answers these questions you see her eyebrows raise and her eyes widen, which is a signal of submission in that she knows full well that her constituents elected her, not God.
This body language tell demonstrated that she knows exactly what she is doing and in my view is doing this for attention and to get her 15 minutes of fame and attention.
She also showed a signal of deception when she said she had friends who were gay and lesbian but they don’t agree on this issue and they were OK with that. I SERIOUSLY doubt that ANY gay person would be OK with her defying the Supreme Court and not issuing them a marriage license and preventing them from a marriage simply because they were gay.
She knows full well that what she said was not true because she immediately looks away as she says this.
She then fake cries with no tears when she says that she did deny gay friends a marriage license. Then you immediately see her leak out a smile as you can see above . This is called “duping delight.” It means she is happy she denied her gay friends a license because of her so called religious beliefs.
She does manage to cry genuine tears when she says that what concerns her is that what concerns her the most is that her God doesn’t love her and God is not happy with her that she is a hypocrite.
If that is such a concern to her then she needs to step down from her position immediately. Her tears and concern for her God’s love of her illustrates that she knows what she has done is wrong in the eyes of her God by her being hypocritical by not being tolerant of others and in not obeying the law. Here she is questioning what her God thinks of her and her tears reflect that she doesn’t believe God is thinking well of her.
No matter what, she needs to step down. This hypocritical and obviously disturbed woman refuses to sign the licenses and in essence is not doing her job, But she will not step down because she appears to LOVES the attention. By stating she is willing to go to jail again, it shows that she loves attention perhaps even more than she loves her God.
When someone shakes their head no and says they are sorry for everything they did, when they are supposed to be shaking their head in the affirmative position, you can rest assured that they are not very sorry about what they did.
She says that she did what she did in helping prisoners Richard Matt and David Sweat escape because he was trying to help her family. As she says this her voice dies off at the end which is often a signal of deception, especially in this context.
She also repeats Matt Lauer of the Today Show’s answer when she say It is fair to say we became friends as she looks down. She is really indicating that they were more than friends as her body language indicates deception.
She has justified her actions in getting involved with these Toxic criminals who committed heinous crimes by stating that “she is too nice”. She said that people constantly tell her she is “too nice”. To me, she is parroting what her defense lawyer must have used to defend her. There is NOTHING nice about helping a criminal who cut his boss’ body up into little pieces or helping a criminal who killed a police officer. She is living in an illusion when she says this.
She says that she gave Matt the tools she requested because she told her that he loved her. She said she answered him with I love my husband. “As she says this she looks down. his makes no sense because if she loved her husband she wouldn’t be involved with Matt in the first place.
She also does what is known as “duping delight.” She leaks out a smile as she tells about her ordeal.She is not sorry for what she did but is sorry that she got caught and now has to spend her time in prison.
Donald Trump emerged as winner again in terms of his body language and delivery as did Chris Christie. Both were genuine and spoke directly to the people. They weren’t rehearsed and they both showed a lot of energy. They got their message across with passion and conviction
Another candidate who did very well in the debates was Marco Rubio. he was well spoken and articulate and his gestures matched what he was conveying verbally.
While Carla Fiorina’s looks may not the issue and Trump did apologize to her in his own way by telling her she looked lovely, her voice pattern left a lot to be desired. It was creaky, labored and staccato, monotone and she often sounded rehearsed, especially when giving a speech about Lady Liberty. Her voice pattern in my view is annoying. There is no doubt that she needs some serious voice coaching if she is to be heard and if she wants to get her message across.
Also needing vocal help is Jeb Bush. Trump is right in that he lacks energy and enthusiasm when he speaks and sounds very boring and monotone.
Rand Paul not only sounded monotoned but was monofaced. He looked haggard and angry throughout the debate. His voice pattern also sounded nasal and did not resonate well.
The same holds true for Dr. Ben Carson. He too is monotone and his tones are lack luster. He sounds boring. His face is also monotoned in terms of exhibiting facial animation. Perhaps his best exchange was with Trump when he said that Trump was an OK doctor.
Scott Walker often phumphered and stammered during the debates which made him seem unsure of himself.
Ted Cruz’s voice sound high pitched and nasal which is off putting. Instead of talking to the audience or to the moderators like the other candidates did, he looked into the camera. This seemed contrived, as he shared an obviously rehearsed message.
Huckabee also sounded rehearsed and contrived . In addition, his gestures were rehearsed and mechanical and did not match the content of what he was saying. His looking directly into the camera when she spoke which did not make him appear genuine.
While Lindsey Graham’s Southern accent may be charming, he often sounds monotone and his gestures do not match what he is saying. Many of his gestures made no sense in relationship to what he was saying as you can see in the photo above.
With the exception of Trump, Christie and Rubio, the rest of the candidates could use some serious vocal and body language coaching to improve the way they come across during the debates.
Once again this is NOT a political piece. This is merely a blog about the way these candidate’s presented themselves in front of millions of people during the debates.
When someone reaches the glorious age of 103, they need to be revered not punished and put through emotional hardship. No matter what happened with 103 year old congregant and former teacher Genora Hamm Biggs and her minister,Tim Mattox ( a former student of hers), he should never have had her banned from the church she and her family founded, just because she spoke out and told him about things she didn’t like that he was doing and what was happening to the church. Continue reading
Josh Duggar, the eldest son on TLC’s Reality Show “19 and Counting” who admitted to sexuay abusing his sisters, has now
admitted that he is a hypocrite and has a secret addiction to pornography as he was caught on the Ashley Madison site- a site
which caters to married cheaters having affairs. Anna Duggar, Josh’s wife is clearly in denial and engaging in self blaming for
Josh’s egregious behavior.
It is reported that Anna says she is not leaving her cheating husband and will stick by him. In fact she is reported to be turning
to her faith much like her in-laws and doing a lot of praying. In my view she and her in-laws are doing a lot of denying.
No prayer and no faith can help a very mentally sick individual with perverted behavior, like Josh has shown to be. he needs a
lot f therapy and not the faith based religious kind of therapy which clearly did not work on him.
According those close to her, Anna is trying to absorb some of the blame. for Josh’s perverted actions of cheating on her. In fact she apparently blames herself for not being more aware of the pressures Josh was under . She apparently is beating herself up for not having counseled him better.
In my view her alleged statements reveal that she just as disturbed as her husband. She has no connection with reality. There is absolutely nothing she could have done to prevent Josh cheating on her, no doubt when he was pregnant.
It will most likely never happen, but this woman needs to get as far away from Josh and his family as soon as possible. Most likely she will continue to live in denial with her head in the sand like an ostrich. She will never face the reality that her husband has some severe mental problems. She most likely will never listen to anyone who tells her that it is not her fault and that Josh did this on his own and she is not to blame in any way, shape. otr form.
While religion and faith is a great thing for most people. in this case it is not a great thing as we watch Anna stubbornly hide behind her religion and their faith and refuse to see the reality of her very disturbed husband.