Toxic People- Black Friday Terrorists Among US and Solutions to the problem

Screen Shot 2015-11-27 at 9.24.24 AM

After the recent terrorist attacks in Paris, Lebanon, Mali and other places around the world, one would think that Americans would be thankful these acts didn’t occur on our shores. But after reading the headlines over  Thanksgiving and Black Friday, it seems that terrorism is alive and well among us – in our shopping malls and department stores, as there are too many out there who have  been violently attacked.

Here are just a  few of the headlines which makes one feel they are in a war zone instead of celebrating a holiday.

“Black Friday brings pain for family of  Walmart worker killed”

“Black Friday Fight Breaks Out In Baby Section Of Department Store”

“Fist fight over Black Friday deals”

 ‘Kidnapper’ is caught ‘trying to snatch a shopper’s three-year-old grandchild at Walmart’ after lurking at store for hours”

“Brawls break out at Walmart during Black Friday; shoppers wrestle each other to ground in Kentucky food court”

“Woman steals item from child, squabble ensues”

“#BlackFridayMatters: Swarms raid discount TV display; Cop punched”

For many it comes as no surprise that these acts of violence would occur. In fact there is a website designed to morbidly  track injuries and deaths during Black Friday. In fact, the day before Black Friday, there were several warnings throughout the media as to the 10 top states this violence would take place.

According to a study by real estate website Estately, which used Facebook user data and federal crime statistics to determine where people participate in Black Friday sales and where people are more likely to violently attack each other, shoppers are most likely to encounter a Black Friday fight in the following states:

  1. Arkansas
  2. Tennessee
  3. Alabama
  4. Louisiana
  5. Missouri
  6. West Virginia
  7. Oklahoma
  8. Indiana
  9. Kansas
  10. South Carolina

But these predictors were  absolutely wrong as the violence based on the above headlines of where this violence actually occurred  have been in states  which not on the Esterly  list, They include:

1. Kentucky                                                                                                                 2.Georgia                                                                                                                         3. New York                                                                                                                     4. Michigan                                                                                                                    5.Texas                                                                                                                              6. California

Screen Shot 2015-11-27 at 9.27.36 AM

There sales bring out the absolute worst in people. Therefore there must either be a more organized system for shopping during these special sale holidays  such as:                                                                                                                      a. a limited group of people are allowed to enter stores at at time                    b. they can order the items via a catalog ahead of time and pick it up at             the store or have it mailed to them or                                                                    c. they can do something like is done at Brookstone where you see the               items you want,write down your purchase ,and the clerk goes and                  gets it for you.                                                                                                                 d. or  the ultimate solution to this problem would be that these Black                Friday sales days should only be allowed to occur online.

No innocent person should have to die, get kidnapped or beaten up while shopping for some items on sale.



Charlie Sheen’s body language during interview regarding his partners shows deception



While actor Charlie Sheen did a brave thing by publicly admitting  on the Today Show that he is HIV positive, he may have  lied as he seems to have shown signals of deception  when  asked if he had unprotected sex . He said that the two people he had sex with were under the care of his doctor and were completely warned ahead of time.

As he was asked the question you could see him licking his lips. Then he phumphers  with his speech and then he gets defensive as he leans towards Matt Lauer, the interviewer. He also looks down as he says that there were only two and that they were under the care of his doctor and completely warned. all of these seem to be signals of deception.

Besides seeing the many signals of deception in his answer, the fact that he said that the two  women with whom he had unprotected sex were under the care of his doctor and warned, raises red flags. First of all why were these women under the care of his doctor. Secondly no reputable  doctor is going to say that a person having sexual relations with someone with HIV is  completely in the clear and that they can have sex without a condom. This is especially  true for Charlie’s physician,, Robert Huizinga, whom I know very well and who is an extremely reputable physician.

Screen Shot 2015-11-17 at 7.19.24 AM.png

In fact Dr. Huizinga reported in the press  that he is  indeed afraid that Sheen could spread HIV, especially if she goes on an alcohol and drug bender and forgets to take his medicine. Knowing that Charlie has a tendency to go on binges and may forget to take his medicine, once again it is seriously doubtful that Dr. Huizenga would tell any woman she was in the clear and didn’t have to use protection  when having sexual relations. with Charlie.

Charlie even admitted to using alcohol and drugs heavily after his HIV diagnosis which is further evidence that in his altered state he could forget to take his medicine and therefore expose his sex partners to the virus.

If he did indeed have unprotected sex when  he knew he  was  is infected with HIV in California it is a crime. Apparently he settled several cases with people who were not aware of his HIV status and had sex with him. If he did have unprotected sex, under California law, he could get 6 months in jail. Also if he knew he had HIV with the intent to transmit the disease to them, it would be a felony and could receive up to  8 years in prison.

Hopefully all of the women that Charlie engaged sexually are not infected with the virus.

One of the women with whom he did have with, Bree Olson, one of his “godessess” admitted to Howard Stern that Charlie did not tell her he was HIV positive. The question now is how many others did he not tell and how many women have been exposed to HIV because of his reckless behavior.

According to reports before he admitted his diagnosis,  Charlie seemed to have been worried that his fans would not accept him because  he was HIV positive. But the reality is that fans may not accept him  not becuase he is HIV positive, but because of his irresponsible behavior and exposing others to HIV when he knew he was infected with the virus.











Obama and Netanyahu Body Language Shows They Still Can’t Stand One Another

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 8.51.29 AM

Even though the two world leaders, Benjamin Netanyahu and Barak Obama finally got together  to meet after a year, there is still no love lost between them. Netanyahu was in the US to to discuss the nuclear deal with Iran and other regional conflicts, including the violence in Palestine.

While it had been no secret that the prime minister of Israel and the President of the United States  have had a strong disagreements in the past, their common thread is that they are both in favor of making sure Iran does not get a nuclear weapon. Another point of agreement is regarding the importance of dealing with violence.

But in terms of their body language Obama still can’t seem to hide his disdain for Netanyahu ever since the Israeli Prime Minister accepted an invitation to speak, whereby Obama took the move as a personal affront by  netanyahu and Republicans  in Congress going around the White House to invite him to give a joint address to th Senate and the House of Representatives.

Look at the photo above and you will see the tightness in Obama’s jaw signifying anger. He is pursing his lips as he looks at Netanyahu eye to eye. Obama slunches  over when he reaches out to shake Netanyahu’s han. There also seems to be an aggressive power handshake with Obama as you can see his thumb deliberately pressing hard on Netanyahu’s hand.

Netanyahu is also not pleased about Obama  a you can see from the tension in his jaw and tight lips.

Screen Shot 2015-11-09 at 8.51.47 AM

Feet can tell a lot about how a person is feeling towards the other  as well.In this case we see Obama’s legs are crossed and his foot and toes are positioned upwards. This means that he can’t wait to leave the meeting.  This in in contrast to Netanyahu’s fet which are firmly planted on the ground.Also their feet are not pointing directly in one another’s direction which further indicates  they don’t feel good about one another.

Hands are also telling as both men are holding on to themselves in order to contain their true feelings. Netanyahu hold;s on to his fingers while Obama self comforts by olding on to his thighs. It shows how uncomfortable they are with one another.

Another telling signal of their disdain towards one another is that their heads are completely turned away from one another. Netanyahu turns his head to the left and looks away from Obama while Obama looks straight ahead, not  relating to Netanyahu’s presence.

So even though the two allies – the US and Israel  met to demonstrate their bond, there was definitely no bonding going on between the two leaders as you can see in this photo op.

Democratic Debate Body Language: Sanders Passion, Down Home Style and Hillary’ Warm, Poised Control

Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 10.42.38 PM

All politics aside, if there was a winner in terms of body language and delivery in the first  Democratic debate it would be a tie between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Saunders. All politics aside she has made significant positive changes in terms of her delivery since she first announced her candidacy. She was warm, engaging, handled herself well under pressure, smiled more, was respectful to her fellow candidates when they spoke had appropriate gestures which matched what she was saying and only on a few occasions  did the silly political gesture of pressing her thumb and two fingers together when she emphasized points.  She was also strong voiced and spoke loudly when she expressed her disagreemt. This was in stark contrast to her previous public speeches where she was robotoc and monotone.  During this debate, she  had excellent posture and moved more  fluidly than she had in the past. She seemed very comfortable and was not  stiff and mechanical as she had been in the past. She expressed a range of emotiona and appeared more genuine and real than she shad presented in the past

Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 10.43.33 PM

Bernie Sanders was warm and engaging as well. He had a down home style that was very appealing as it seemed as though he was talking directly to you. He is tone sounded like a familiar uncle. While he had a somewhat cartoonish Elmer Fudd type  accent, it was rather appealing. He was the most passionate of all the candidates in terms of his delivery. Sometimes it was over the top but her was very watchable, much like Donald Trump in terms of his  of not being reserved about speaking his mind without worries of political correctness. He made many open handed gestures where you often saw the palm of his hand, indicating his openness and having  nothing to hide. His body language and gestures matched what he said.

Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 10.42.28 PM

While the handsomest candidate was O’Malley, after hearing him speak in his monotonous droning voice that was muffled and breathy, he lost a lot of points.  He was so monotone, staccato, and boring in his delivery that it negated his good looks and whatever he had to say. While he seemed cordial and polite, he was so boring that it was very easy for the viewer to tune out when she spoke. His absence of inflection and vocal enthusiasm could have easily put some to sleep.

Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 10.43.52 PM

The same was true for  Chafee who had a high pitch tinny sounding voice. It did not have a leadership sound. There was a significant whine to his tone which was not appealing. You really heard the whine when she talked about the first time he voted and made a lame excuse about his father’s death which did not put him in a good light. He also smiled inappropriately and his gestures often didnt match what he was saying. He didnt sound like  a leader in terms of his delivery and presentation

Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 10.44.10 PM

Webb appeared angry with a fixed scowl on his face. His posture was too rigid and mechanical . So was his facial expression. He was not engaging but consistently angry sounding. His staccato tone was also off putting.

It is clear that Webb, Chafee, and O’Malley need some serious voice and speech and body language coaching if they plan on getting their message heard in the second debate. Communication  skills are key to winning a Presidency. If you are boring,  monotonous, whiney, or your body language doesn’t match what you say, people are turned off with you.

Once again I will reiterate that this is not a political blog and that this is not about politics but rather about their delivery in terms of how the candidates presented themselves in front of  voters.

Toxic Verbal Violence and Verbal Murder Towards Any Political Candidate Is Unacceptable

Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 5.54.20 AM

Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 5.54.20 AM

It is  certainly acceptable to disagree with a candidate’s views on certain issues.  It is also acceptable to express yourself passionately. But it is not acceptable to become verbally violent and commit verbal murder on a candidate because you disagree with them.  Donald Trump being brutally and anally  raped  by a male character and then killed on an episode of South Park  is not funny. There is nothing funny about being anally raped or killed. In fact close to three million men have in the United States have been victims of sexual assault  and rape. That is not satire in my view. It is sick and highly disturbing. Comedy Central should never be allowed to air such a thing. In my view it has crossed the line.

Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 6.02.14 AM

Then to have a person on  Meghan Kelly’s show on Fox News,  Rick Lowry talk about Trumps “balls being cut off”  is in my view grounds for never having this person on the airwaves again. It is unprofessional and unacceptable.   In fact DonaldTrump  tweeted about the matter by relaying that “Incompetent lost it tonight on . He should not be allowed  on TV and the FCC should fine him!”


Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 6.26.05 AM

As the host of the show, Megan Kelly’s body language showed that she  acted like a school girl  by tittering away and covering her eyes as she laughed. You can see in the photo above where there is a three shot of her Rich Lowry and the gentleman from the Blaze. While she is no fan of Donald Trump, she is still a host of a show and needed to act more professionally in my view. Instead of giggling and saying “What did you say?”  to her vulgar guest and covering her eyes.

Instead,, she needed to reprimand Lowry and immediately tell  him that his  language was not acceptable to use on the air. The level of hatred  towards  candidates on both sides is frightening. It speaks volumes about how too many have become so desensitized that they have lost their humanity. There has to be some level of decorum and some boundaries which should never be crossed.

Once again this is not a political blog nor am I defending any particular candidate. I would say the same thing about any candidate who was discussed in such a Toxic  manner where there were depicted as being raped or killed or had their genitals mutilated.

Kim Davis Shows Hypocrisy, Deception, and A Love for Attention In GMA Interview

Screen Shot 2015-09-22 at 8.58.44 AM

When confronted with the fact that she was married four times and had children in her adulterous relationships and whether or not she was a hypocrite, Kim Davis  realizes she has been busted by the reporter.   She  cocks her head to the side and  her eyes search to the right as she tries to come up with a response. Her response is that she is forgiven and “washed clean.”

In essence she is saying that those whom she refuses to give a marriage license to because they are gay are not clean and are in essence dirty.

She said that when she  found God four years ago she couldn’t separate church from state. Well in my view, that is the time she needed to step down from her position as she was not effectively doing her job because one in any government position must be able to separate church from state. When the Supreme Court ruling came down, she needed to step away from her position since she could not  separate church from state.

Screen Shot 2015-09-22 at 9.10.18 AM

While she says that Godly authority trumps all other authority, she does realize that her constituents are the ones who elected her. As she answers these questions you see her eyebrows raise and her eyes widen, which is a signal of submission in that she knows full well that her constituents elected her, not God.

This body language tell demonstrated that she knows exactly what she is doing and in my view is doing this for attention and to get her 15 minutes of fame and attention.

Screen Shot 2015-09-22 at 9.15.57 AM

She also showed a signal of deception when she said she had friends who were gay and lesbian  but they don’t agree on this issue and they were OK with that. I SERIOUSLY doubt that ANY gay person would be OK with her defying the Supreme Court and not issuing them a marriage license and preventing them from a marriage simply because they were gay.

Screen Shot 2015-09-22 at 9.15.51 AM

She knows full well that what she said was not true because she immediately looks away as she says this.

Screen Shot 2015-09-22 at 9.24.32 AMShe then fake cries with no tears when she says that she did deny gay friends a marriage license. Then you immediately  see her leak out a smile as you can see above . This is called “duping delight.”  It means she is happy she denied her gay friends a license because of her so called religious beliefs.

Screen Shot 2015-09-22 at 9.29.46 AM

She does manage to cry  genuine tears when she says that what concerns her is that what concerns her the most is that her God doesn’t love her and  God is not happy with her that she is a hypocrite.

If that is such a concern to her then she needs to step  down from her position immediately.  Her tears and concern for her God’s love of her illustrates that she knows what she has done is wrong in the eyes of  her God by her  being hypocritical by not being tolerant of others and in not obeying the law. Here she is questioning what her God thinks of her and her tears reflect that she doesn’t believe God is thinking well of her.

No matter what, she needs to step down.  This hypocritical and obviously disturbed woman refuses to sign the licenses and in essence is not doing her job, But she will not step down because she  appears to LOVES the attention. By stating she is willing to go to jail again, it shows that she loves attention perhaps even more than she  loves her God.