Keith Papini’s Body Language Disturbingly Odd on 20/20 Could Wife’s Alleged Kidnapping Be a Hoax?

screen-shot-2016-12-03-at-10-24-29-pm

When someone cannot make eye contact during a 6 part interview,

screen-shot-2016-12-03-at-10-24-37-pm

when they cry  alligator tears with no liquid coming out of their eyes in a 6 part interview,

screen-shot-2016-12-04-at-1-59-10-am

when the recovery time of an alleged crying breakdown is too quick with milliseconds in length,

screen-shot-2016-12-04-at-2-05-19-am

when someone inappropriately laughs,

screen-shot-2016-12-03-at-10-34-18-pm

and shows duping delight,

screen-shot-2016-12-03-at-10-24-29-pm

and suddenly pulls their nose.

screen-shot-2016-12-03-at-10-40-55-pm

and when I  hear:

a.  stammering,

b. too much information ( re which hands were chained and tucking in her chain on the freeway so someone would stop)

c. too many convenient  explanations     like why it would make sense for 2 women to be the abductors as opposed to 2 men when questioned by the reporter) and when

d. things  that are too coincidental ,like the balloon launch and  her conveniently re-appearing at Thanksgiving.

it makes me concerned that something about this case and this entire story is amiss. It makes me question if we have all been hoodwinked and whether this is a hoax. I am not saying it is a hoax. I am not accusing anyone of it being a hoax. I am just questioning it.

Here is why I am concerned:

  1. Thanksgiving being mentioned too many times. The fact that Keith  mentioned Thanksgiving several times ( how it was Thanksgiving day and his phone rang, and how Sherri had a conversation with law enforcement about Thanksgiving etc.)  Could this have been a hoax and a  plan by the couple for Sherri to be “released” by Thanksgiving. Maybe maybe not. Maybe it was a coincidence.

2. Seeing  the photos of the couple.

screen-shot-2016-12-04-at-1-55-13-amscreen-shot-2016-12-04-at-1-52-08-am

There were too many posed and professional photos like the one of him lifting her up in the air like a ballerina and her looking directly into the camera with his eyes closed, looking away from her. It is a posed photo that is disturbing to me in light of the circumstances. It shows a man who is in control of his wife as you can see in the second black and white photo where he is seen engulfing her with his arm. Are these people with bigger dreams than being a housewife and a salesperson?

3. Keith  being Too In Control. Keith was indeed was in control during the interview as he volunteered up way too much information, some which was contradictory. For instance ,Sherri is allegedly bruised and battered and fragile,  yet he is able to get on the floor with her and the kids for a family hug, which he revealed at the end of the interview. That seemed odd to me.

4. No Photo of Sheri Post Trauma.  Why wasn’t there  photo of how Sheri looked after her alleged ordeal? If she was too vain, why wasn’t  she shown in silhouette or why didn’t we just hear her voice?  Why was Keith the only one speaking for her when it was her ordeal? If she was shown perhaps more people wuld have seen for themselves what happened  to her.

5. Control Freak Keith ? The next thing that concerns  me is  Keith is way  too much in control of this situation, which may possibly indicate to many people  that  perhaps he may have had something to do with the situation. He  allegedly  doesn’t call his wife, but  instead uses an app to track her phone’s location . This indicted  to me that he may be the type of control freak husband  who  may go to extremes to track his wife. He either doesn’t trust her and has to check up on her regularly or he is a control- freak abuser type man.No matter what- this is a huge red flag to me.

6.  Phone App. He used  the phone app and said  she was at the mailbox a mile away. He said he got into HER car and drove to the mailbox. Why did he drive her car  not his car? And again why drive anywhere? Why not call her?   For someone who doesn’t bother to call his wife’s phone, he sure makes a lot of other calls like to his mom and to his kid’s daycare center. Is he calling them to set up an alibi? He called  the school to ask when Sherri picked up the kids and they told him the kids were there. Were the kids conveniently left there? Did he go get the kids immediately?  Did he feel relieved the kids were safe? He didn’t mention that. Instead, he said his family members stepped up and took care of them and he was happy they did that.

7. Selfishness?  And from the interview  I gathered he perhaps may be  a selfish type of man. He said he was glad she was found because he didn’t want to raise his kids alone without her. When asked if he was concerned the kidnappers were out there and if they could do it to someone else, he said no, he was just glad she was back. That is the wrong answer. If someone is kidnapped and returns, one has a concern that the kidnappers  are still on the loose. So that is another thing that makes me and others  question things. Also the fact that he said  NO he was wasn’t concerned was upsetting to many.

8. Sherri’s  Neatly Found Phone? He leaks out telling information as he  volunteers he wasn’t looking for a phone, he was looking for Sherri. That is odd. Wouldn’t Sherri be with her phone? Then he conveniently finds her iphone off the side of the road, with the cords neatly placed on the face of the phone. He seems to be a neat freak type of guy as we saw how neat his house looked . So if that is his pattern, did he neatly place the phone there? Also his taking a  photo of the phone is very peculiar to me personally. Was he setting up an alibi or offering proof that he had nothing to do with the alleged kidnap by “finding” her phone and talking photos to prove it? Why didn’t he wait for law enforcement to do that and to look for tire tracks or something else that may give a clue. The hair on the phone cords was also too obvious to me.It appeared like it got ripped from her head. Those cords are plastic or silicone, so hair wouldn’t usually stick to it so neatly.  Also there is  visible proof of long strands of hair on the cord and then he says her hair was cut off by the abductors. This  shows there is some charge about the hair.This may or may not be of concern.

9.  “Taken” ?  Also he keeps using the word “taken” too many times, He doesn’t say “kidnapped “or “abducted ,but” taken” To me that may be  telling. Also he never mentioned that he was concerned at her being alive or whether someone killed her. He was just concerned that she was “taken.”

10. Attention and Laughing.  He also seems to love attention as we gleaned from the interview. He smiled readily when he said he wanted the marines and a swat team to find his wife. He even laughs at this. This is very indicative of someone who may  crave attention. In addition, he said he was glad the neighbors and the “world” was looking for her. As he said this his eyebrows raised and he smiled in delight. When he said  “everyone in the  whole world is looking for her right now” he laughs like he is enjoying the notoriety that everyone in the world is looking for his wife. His laugh may have possibly indicated duping delight to me that he was thrilled the world got involved .

Also when his son asked him if he was looking for his mother, Keith treats it lightly and laughs. He makes light of it when it is not a laughing matter. In fact to a little boy, it is a very serious matter. He then says to his son “were gonna find her and get her back”. How can he be sure he is going to get her back unless he knows this for sure, or it is a set up? We don’t know this for sure.

11.  Shoulder Shrug?  He said in the interview he was ” gonna do everything he can” to find his wife, but he   shrugs his shoulders. This is often a signal of deception. Why was he shrugging his shoulders?

12.  Not Concerned if She is Dead or Alive?  Then he says something revealing in my view. He doesn’t ask is she is alive or dead . Instead he asks “is she hot,  is she cold,  are they feeding her.” Who thinks like that unless he knows that it is a “they” and not one person. Did he know the “they” he is referring to ?  Did he know what happened? Did he set it up? Did he pay for someone to torture her but not kill her?   That is just speculation . Did he know she was live? Is that why he wondered how she was being treated.? Why did he use those terms?

13. EGO? Then we see he has a pretty big ego and it also validates he may possibly  in control over Sherri as his main thought, which is off  and most revealing, is ”  I thought of her screaming my name  and me not being there.” WHAT??? If someone is kidnapped why would  you think they would be screaming your name? Is he subconsciously revealing that she may  be screaming his name because she may know he is behind this? Why would he think she was screaming his name?  It is too odd a statement to overlook.

14. Not Finishing Though About Birds?  He then says he sees birds and he is thinking of birds. He doesn’t say he saw birds and thought there may be a dead body  around the birds and that the body could be his wife. So that is very odd to  to me as well.MOst people would think of a dead body if the person was missing for so long.

14.  Relationship With Son. His relationship with his 4 year old is very disturbing. He allegedly tells his 4 year old that mommy is missing after a few weeks. A 4 year old is pretty sharp. Wouldn’t they ask and wonder where their mother was all that time? Then the cockamaymie story about the boy seeing his mother and telling her she is not supposed to cry when she is happy is absurd to me in my view. What was also telling was that  he says the boy was in his arms while she held Violet the 2 year old.I also dont buy the story that the son is looking at a poster of his missing mom with his hand on her face and tears in his eyes. A 4 year old  would have tears rolling down his face,  not tears  in his eyes. Wouldn’t he ask about mommy before a few weeks?

15. Makeshift Violet.  And speaking of Violet,  way too much information  was being revealed when Keith relayed that Sherri rolled up a rag or some cloth when she was allegedly in captivity and cradled it and called it Violet. To me that sounds indicative of a psychotic breakdown or perhaps is it something he or she made up? Who knows what really happened?

16. Defensiveness. His defensiveness is also cause for concern. Police said in the  presser , they don’t know if it is or isn’t an abduction. Keith  is defensive as he says ” I know she was taken. My family knows she was taken” as  he smiles a duping delight smile. How does he KNOW she was taken when Law enforcement isn’t sure she was taken?

17. Sister and Sister in Law. Her sister and his sister, they didn’t seem to be too emotional when discussing Sherri going missing. That may or may not seem relevant.

screen-shot-2016-12-03-at-10-40-55-pm

18. Polygraph and Nose Pulling? What was also very telling to me was that he took a polygraph. Polygraphs can be manipulated as that is why they aren’t admissible in a  court of law.Is he possibly a  sociopath as they can often beat a polygraph. He may also not be directly involved and may have convinced himself of that. But to me what was telling was when the reporter asked if during the polygraph they asked “did you have anything to do with her disappearance?” While he said no problem, he  shakes his head  and pulls his nose,  which to me indicates his autonomic nervous system is working overtime and that there is some charge on what he may or may not know.Also who did the polygraph test? What were the results? A polygraph is non infallable.

19.  Too Detailed?  He gets way too detailed as he talks about her taking off  the bag over her head and having no idea where she was, shrugging his shoulders as he says this. Also how was she so close to a freeway?  I wondered how she knew the freeway was nearby. He then says she screamed so hard she coughed up blood. That would be the opposite. You wouldn’t be able to speak if you screamed so hard . Coughing up blood may be due to lung issues or intestinal issues  or may be due to her starving for 22 days. In working with so many people with vocal conditions too much screaming results in a loss of voice not blood.

20. Making It About Him. As he talks about her bumps and bruises and her losing 15 percent of her body weight he says he hugged her for 20 minutes and then felt nauseous. Again he makes it about him- his nausea at looking at her.He should not have said this as if she sees this it will make her feel worse than she already must be feeling.

21. Vague about Branding .Also he was very vague about the branding and until pressed by the reporter he wanted everyone to assume it was on her face but later admitted it wasn’t on her face, when he was essentially called on it.What wasn’t he upfront about it?

22.  Slow Speech. What also was telling was that he was searching for words when he said very very slowly  “it made me sick that there are people out there who could do  do something like this” all said with non-tears.

23.  Hispanics Wearing Masks for 22 Days. What else is suspicious to me is that there was a black SUV and one woman had curly black hair while the other had straight black hair with some gray in it and bushy eyebrows as their faces were always covered. I don’t buy that. They had covered faces for 22 days? No way.  And  to boot they didn’t speak English. Apparently they cut off her hair. Why would they do that unless there was a personal vendetta. It is way too personal an act. Also wouldn’t they feed her to keep her alive so they could get money for her?  Wouldn’t they show some compassion if she was a mother, especially if they were mothers or the 2 Hispanic women were mother and daughter.  How come they didn’t kill her?  Could the truth be that there were no Hispanic women?

24.Too Quick Answer for Being 2 Women Opposed to 2 Men.  He also has too quick an answer when he says it makes sense that his wife would go with two women who asked for help as opposed to two men. If she didn’t see their faces , how were these women driving with a bandana or a mask? Why would Sherri offer to  help or get into their car if she never saw their faces. Then these women allegedly drove 2 1/2 hours and she never sees their faces then or afterwards for for 22  days. This makes me even more suspicious. Is this a hoax?

based on my body language and communication observations I question a lot of things. Are they both in on it or she did it alone? If she did it , was to get back at her control-freak husband?  Was it  a cry for help on her part.? And yes she could have chopped off her own hair, starved herself, punched herself ( like the women who was going to falsely accuse her rich husband of beating her when surveillance camera revealed she was beating herself) or  perhaps punched herself using the chain she had with her, and could have even branded herself or she could have gotten the brand earlier  before she was allegedly abducted.  These are possibilities. If they are in this together then  was it  for a shot at their 15 minutes of fame and fortune?

A. If it was sex traffickers they wouldn’t want a 30 something year old woman and they wouldn’t starve her, beat her ,or cut her hair off in my view. Otherwise who would have sex with her in that condition?  They would release her somewhere when they discovered she was too old and it would be immediately not 22 days later in my view.

B. If it was female sex offenders they usually don’t go for older women. They go for teen boys or girls.  There was also no mention of her being around a male so there was no male sex offender in the mix. While sex traffickers are  known to brand their victims, did she brand herself or paid to be branded like people are paid to be pierced,  before she was allegedly “taken.” Maybe the branding was thrown in to point fingers to sex traffickers and get people to not think about it being a hoax. Again this is speculation but food for thought.

C.  No one asked for sex, money, and no one died  so is this  manufactured?

There also people who are severely mentally ill who  create such scenarios. Remember the runaway bride? Remember that Tawyana Brawley? They  all said  they were beaten and treated horribly when in fact they did it to themselves.

Could all of this high drama kidnapping  be a ploy from the couple to make them famous and to get money?  Keith in the interview certainly got off on the fame part and people knowing  about them and the “world: looking for her as he revealed in his delighted smile.

Were they  paid for the interview ( directly or indirectly)?  So maybe that is what happened.  Maybe not. Nothing else makes sense to me in this case. It is all very confusing.

I hope and pray that it is not a hoax. If it is not a hoax I hope they catch the people that kidnapped her. If it is a hoax then it is a terrible shame.

I also want to say I am not accusing Keith or Sherri of anything. I am not accusing them of this being a hoax. I am merely asking questions which perhaps many people who saw Keith’s performance on 20/20 might ask.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rosie’s Tweeted Apology to Melania Insincere

screen-shot-2016-11-29-at-3-38-18-am

screen-shot-2016-11-29-at-3-37-11-amAnalysis of Rosie O’Donnell’s tweet where she allegedly apologized to Melania for asking if Baron was autistic, showed insincerity and  embarrassment at all the backlash she received.   O’Donnell wrote the following tweet:

 “I apologize to @MELANIATRUMP – i was insensitive in my RT – i am sorry for the pain i caused – it was not my intent – i am truly sorry.”

Look at the i’s. She begins it with a capital I but in three other places she uses the small  “i” indicating that she is embarrassed and ashamed. It shows a lack of self confidence in her statement. But in my view, she is embarrassed not by what she said, but embarrassed  because she got caught and the backlash was so strong against her. People who were even her fans let her have it for calling out her nemesis’ 10 year old son as being autistic.

As further indication of her embarrassment, she got rid of her twitter account to the public and made it private. that is a huge indication that she is retreating in shame from the public who lambasted her.

When she says she was insensitive in her RT (retweet) she is attempting to share the blame in stating that it wasn’t really her fault because she just tweeted what someone else tweeted in the first place. Also the use of the word “insensitive” shows insincerity. Had she said I was “wrong” it my retweet it would have been a stronger more real apology.

She said I am sorry for the pain I caused. What about saying that she is sorry for tweeting misinformation. In saying this she is making it about her -and showing how she things she has so much power to cause another pain. If she was truly sincere she would have said I am sorry “you were hurt.” It makes you wonder if she did indeed enjoy causing that pain. After all, she despises Trump. So anything to hurt him- like hurting his wife and his son would certainly not cause her to feel sorry. She also  doesn’t say she was in pain for hurting Melania.

Also there is too much repetition of the same phrases and same theme  ie. “I apologize”, “i am sorry”   “i am truly sorry”which smacks of deception. The word “truly” means just the opposite here.There is too much information and the adjective reflects that she is trying too hard to convince Melania how sorry she is.

The most telling tell of all is that she did not even  mention Baron. He is the one that really deserves her apology.

 

 

Toxic Rosie O’Donnell Insinuates Baron Trump is Autistic as Tweet and Video Show How A Little Information In the Wrong Hands Can Be Dangerous

screen-shot-2016-11-29-at-3-37-11-am

screen-shot-2016-11-29-at-3-38-18-am

The ongoing Donald Trump vs Rosie O’Donnell Feud (which Rosie started when she attacked Trump’s looks when she was on the View)  took huge turn when O’Donnell hit below the belt and had the audacity to bring 10 year old Baron Trump into the fray with a  claim that  he may be autistic.

All I can say is HOW DARE HER? She is not a doctor, psychologist, therapist, neurologist, behavior expert, or even a body language expert. Her diagnostic technique is not formal or professional. Instead, she outs her own 3 year old  daughter and says that her daughter was recently diagnosed with autism and that she recognizes the signs in Baron. Well her daughter is not Baron and she did not formally diagnose the boy.

I am  appalled at Rosie  for even bringing this up in her horrible tweet :

Barron Trump Autistic? if so – what an amazing opportunity to bring attention to the AUTISM epidemic https://t.co/Acgy1Qxyqi via @YouTube

— Rosie (@Rosie) November 22, 2016

Apparently there was a video that was posted by a  YouTube user named  James Hunter, titled “Is Barron Trump Autistic? #StopTheBullying” which apparently  shows examples of Barron’s behavior at public events. The video has been viewed more than 2.5 million times since it was posted Nov. 11.

It showed Barron clapping at the Republican National Convention and points out “his hands are moving erratically and not touching each other.” The video also shows him “making strange movements in his seat, typical in children with autism.”

“One of the biggest signs of autism is a lack of social skills and understanding,” the video said. “When Barron came on stage at the RNC his anti-social behavior was on display.”

It goes on to show Barron standing blank-faced on stage as his parents and siblings smile and clap. Then it shows Barron shrugging off an affectionate squeeze from his father.

In my view, this  is how a little information in the wrong hands- the hands of James Hunter who is also not a doctor can go awry. This incident also shows how someone with a huge following like Rosie O’Donnell can create even more havoc.

screen-shot-2016-11-29-at-3-37-11-am

The ONLY ones who know if Baron has autism is his neurologist, physician, parents, and family members- no one else! Baron’s mother Melania has fought back and has threatened to sue the video maker and made suggesting that Rosie may be next in line for perpetuating what she claims in a lie as he insists Baron does not have autism.That is the right thing to do in order to put a stop to this potentially damaging labeling behavior, especially if it is not true as Melania says.

To play devil’s advocate- what if he does have it? Why put Baron on display and label him with something he may or may not have that can have serious implications on his future?

He may just be a shy or introverted type of young man. One thing for sure is that he was very disciplined as he stood up on the stage for such a long time without moving around while his President – Elect father gave his victory speech. Body language wise it was impressive behavior from any 10 year old child  or any adult, whether they were autistic or not.

As far as Baron looking blank- faced as the video stated, there may be other reasons for this besides autism. He may be simply uncomfortable with large crowds and with being suddenly thrown into the limelight.  He may be unhappy about having to be thrust out in public which may show on his face. Some children relish and bask in the limelight, while others retreat.

When the video said he shrugged off an affectionate squeeze from his father, I say  that many ten year old boys do not welcome open affection in public as it often embarrasses them. So in my view,  there was nothing atypical or “autistic” about that. The same holds true for the reported “strange clapping.” Personally, I didn’t see anything strange about Baron’s clapping. Once again it may seem odd to him that he has to now  be clapping for his dad in a context in whch he is not familiar.”

Baron may simply be a shy young man, just  like his mother Melania seems to be. He may not be comfortable in the public eye like his sister Ivanka or brothers Donny and Eric. Instead, he may also be shy like  his sister Tiffany.

Being in the public eye and knowing how to comport yourself takes  lot of time and practice. Even the best of celebrities feel uncomfortable. I should know as I have treated many of them personally. Throughout the years I have helped countless high profile people whom you would assume would be comfortable and at ease in any public arena, with their speaking and body language during talk show appearances, Academy Award speeches, and public speaking performances. So it is needless to say that a 10 year old boy may not be comfortable in this arena.

And let’s say for argument’s  sake that Baron may be on the spectrum. I say, “so what!” I know many incredibly successful people who were diagnosed and who function quite well. In fact I just had lunch with a wonderful producer-director last week who told me of his diagnosis. It certainly didn’t stop him from getting Emmy’s an Academy award, having a loving wife with whom he has been married for several decades, and two happy, well adjusted and successful children. It didn’t stop me from wanting to do some business with him. I also know a very successful attorney who hates  public gatherings and social events. At one time he confided in me that as an adult he was diagnosed with being on the spectrum. Once again his diagnosis didn’t hurt his career or his appeal from the ladies, who evidently found his shyness and perceived awkwardness as endearing. Comedian Jerry Seinfeld has publicly admitted he may have the disorder and it certainly didn’t hurt him as he has thrived with an incredibly successful comedy career, a beautiful wife and children.

If Baron does happen to be on the spectrum, he may in fact  be the “new normal”. In  2014 the CDC observed 1 in 68 births had a spectrum disorder. In 2015 the figure rose to 1 in 45. The figures are not yet in for 2016 but there does appear to be an increase in the disorder.

Whether Baron does or does not have the disorder, he needs to be off limits, just like the Obamas made Sasha and Malika off limits. That is why the Clintons tried to make Chelsea off limits when Bill was President. I will never forget how horribly cruel the press and the public was to their daughter Chelsea when she was younger. They constantly  commented on how ugly she looked and how awkward she appeared in her behavior. And the end result is that she grew up to be poised and attractive with a loving husband and two children and there is apparent talk about her hitting the political stage in the future.

There has been considerable backlash against Rosie O’Donnell for her comments and rightfully so. Her friends and her foes have let it be known that her behavior has transcended politics and personal feuding. Now she ventured into seriously unacceptable and dangerous territory.

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Body Language of Porn Star Trump Accuser In Question With Multiple Signals of Deception

screen-shot-2016-10-24-at-8-41-01-am

While I take allegations of sexual harassment very seriously, after seeing so many signals in deception in the other Trump accusers and now in this recent porn star accuser, I am convinced that this is nothing other than a smear campaign. Like the other accusers this recent porn star came forth 10 years too late and 15 days before the election.

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.11.48 AM.png

Watching Gloria Allred  guide and coach her through the script is ridiculous, if not hilarious with Gloria’s serious puss reading the script  along with the accuser to make sure the accuser  doesn’t get off track or make any mistakes. Also the oversized glasses to make her look intelligent is so contrived and absolutely hilarious as well.The whole scenario is so laughable, especially since the porn star just put up a website to sell her porno wares the night before she held a presser to accuse Trump  of  something that  allegedly happened 10 years ago. The reading of the script is also suspect to me. If someone did something to me, I wouldn’t need a script. I could tell you directly without reading it.

Just so you know, many model actresses and even porn stars attend celebrity golf tournaments for pay in order to add some sexy color to the event. Most of these women jump at the chance to attend these events not only for the pay but for the chance to meet a celebrity, make career contacts to get other jobs as well as hooking up with, dating and perhaps even marrying a rich roller.  I know this for  fact because I have treated countless actress/ models  in my practice who have shared these experiences with me. Some have met and even married the men they met at the golf tournament. Others have bagged a film role or a television opportunity. The rich men want to hang with the pretty women and the pretty women want to snag a high roller for whatever purpose can benefit them.

So let’s get this straight.  It is in the morning and apparently  Trump is visiting the VIP Center  before the golf tournament begins, spots a an attractive porn star at the Porn company booth she works for and asks her to take a walk around the golf course. Already that sounds odd to me. Does he ask her to accompany him for his morning walk? Why does she go with him if she is manning the Porn booth.

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.20.55 AM.png.

He then allegedly asks her for his number when she is in the porn booth and she  gives him her number. If she didn’t want anything to do with him why would she give him her number? She said that he asked her to his suite but she felt uncomfortable so she had two other girls accompany her to the suite. So where are these alleged girls now? Why aren’t they up there  seated next to her and Gloria corroborating her story?

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.24.44 AM.png

Then the porn star breaks form her reading  and sneaks a peek  for the camera as she

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.27.58 AM.png

says she “didn’t feel comfortable ” as she she does a selfie- style lip pout for the camera.

Now  the  girls have allegedly all gone to Trump’s suite and what happens next is laughable to me. The porn star does some really bad acting as she acts all haughty and offended because Trump “grabbed each one of the girls and kissed them without asking permission.”  Is she serious???? First of all that is what people do when they meet you, especially in show business . They give you a kiss hello when they meet you.  No one asks permission to kiss you hello.  If you don’t like it you do an air kiss or you pull away. A Hollywood buss as I call it means “I like you”- “you’re Ok and welcome.” So  I see  absolutely nothing strange here, except for the fact that she is in the room of someone she allegedly  didn’t like or feel comfortable with. So porn star, why were you in Trump’s room in the first place?

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.30.40 AM.png

Now she breaths hard and then  licks her lips as you  can see which is usually a signal of deception as she said he was wearing pajamas. First of all wasn’t Trump already dressed earlier when he was allegedly at the porn booth and allegedly had her take a walk with him around the gold course? So why would he get back into his PJ”S. Had she said he was in a robe and naked underneath and his privates were hanging out, that would be one thing. But he was in in PJs. No way! I don’t buy it !

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.37.22 AM.png

Then she said  Trump had  a body guard was with him. Well I want to see that bodyguard and hear it from him as to what happened that morning. But there most likely was no body guard as revealed in her body language where she shakes her head NO as she mentions the bodyguard. If the bodyguard was there she would shake her head YES, not NO. This means there is a conflict in her words and her body language which is often a  signal of deception.

Then she gets even more ridiculous as she says Trump asked her about her porn life and what it was like and if she or the girls were married or single . To me that seems very reasonable and not out of line. He didn’t ask her  anything out of the ordinary. He was just making conversation, especially with someone he just met. which is a reasonable question when you just meant someone Then to me it is clear she is not telling the truth as she says

” his  questions it sounded like an interview. “PUHLEEEEZ . Asking about your life as a porn star is NOT and interview and he saying this sounds very fishy to me.

 

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.40.51 AM.png

Then she leaks out a smile which is classic”duping delight” signal of deception as she takes a deep breath.

She says a man called on Donald’s behalf.  Who is this man? Is he a butler,  a hotel worker, a waiter? She is not specific and  then she says he wants her to come back up to his room  35 minutes later which strikes me as very odd.

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.40.44 AM.png

As she says this we see her head cocks to the side which again may reflect a signal of deception.

And to me this is a non event and a non- story. So what that he  asked her to a dinner and she said no  and he asked her to a party and she said no. Then he allegedly asked her “What do you want?” To me based on Donald’s narcissism if you say NO to him , he will move on. With all the other beauties around, he is not going to pressure you. He will just go and find someone else.  So what she says does not  ring true to me.

Then what she says also does not ring true to me . A porn star’s motivation is usually money.So when he allegedly asked her “how much?,  doesn’t it seem reasonable that she would jump at the chance to name a price?  But then she said she lied to him and said she couldn’t be with him because she had to get back to LA for work.

Screen Shot 2016-10-24 at 8.46.33 AM.png

Now she lies as she cocks her head and makes  a loud expiration of breath as she says I did this as an excuse  because  I didn’t want hm to keep asking me. This smacks of  deception for a number of reasons.

First of all most of these women models are at the golf tournament to meet a man with status and money. I  know this for a fact as so many of them have been my clients. So there is no way she would turn down money or the time spent with a celeb unless she felt she could make more money with an even hotter guy or someone who could do something for her career.

screen-shot-2016-10-24-at-8-54-02-am

Now this sounds  like a PURE LIE to me when she says it using  an upward inflection as though she is asking a question that she received a call from either Donald or a man on his behalf. Surely one would remember if it was Donald or not Donald offering you money.

One thing about Donald is that he knows how to read people in terms of their  body language and vocal tones. If he was not savvy in this regard he would not have become the success he is with people in business. So in my estimation, I believe he was getting some cue from the porn star or he would not have bothered with her.

If Donald wanted her to escort him to  a dinner and to hang out with him for the evening and she said she couldn’t because she had a paying job in LA , it seems perfectly fine that he would offer to pay her day rate for the job she might be missing in LA to compensate her for missing her job if she was with him. This happens all the time in show business and on modeling shoots. Sometimes a shoot runs over and the person may have another job. If they choose to stay,  a they are often compensated handsomely.  And it is negotiated usually through an agent. The fact that Donald even threw in the use of his private jet to help her get back to LA in a timely manner is also quite generous.

But I doubt that Trump offered her money or a private jet based on watching her hard  swallow as she said this. Oftentimes, a hard swallow may be a signal of deception in my view.

Then she says that these actions are a testimony of Trumps character. Well Miss Porn star what about your character of  engaging in sexual acts for money on film. PUHLEEZE!! Isn;t that raether hypocritical?

Now she  clearly  must be using Gloria’s  words as  she says saying he is a “mysogynist  and a sexual assault apologist.” These seem like words that she would not use based on the vocabulary she used in her presser.

Also Miss Holier than Thou Porn Star, Donald, didn’t sexually assault you according to your story. You willingly went up to his room ( with 2 other women you said)  and he asked you to dinner and if you would hang out with him. You said you had to get back to LA  for work so he offered to pay your day rate  and even loan you the jet so you get back to LA in time. So where is the sexual assault here?

If someone accused Hillary of this I would say the same thing so this is not just about defending Trump. I see deception and I see a lot of hypocrisy and I see an opportunist who just put up a website to sell her porn wares the night before she was going public with this ridiculous non- story. Gloria Allred is a Hillary supporter and delegate for her and  it is quite obvious that she is doing all she can to smear Trump with these women, like this porn star who has shown a ridiculous non-story and shown multiple signals of deception in my view.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Madonna at 60 Showing Alzheimer’s Disease By Willingness to Provide Oral Sex to All Hillary Voters And Saying She Also Swallows?

screen-shot-2016-10-20-at-10-28-23-am

Screen Shot 2016-10-20 at 10.28.23 AM.png

Even though it was pretty bad, suddenly Donald Trump’s saying that as a celebrity, you can”grab women’s pussys” suddenly doesn’t sound that bad when compared to Madonna’s recent comments that she wants to give oral sex to all Hillary voters and that she also swallows. Before you say “well Madonna isn’t running for office, Donald Trump is,” I will respond by saying Trump was not a politician 11 years ago when he said  what he did,  in confidence , not aware he was being recorded on a bus when speaking to another immature celebrity. While Trump’s comment showed entitlement as a celebrity and how he observed that women are willing to “give it up” just  to be around a celebrity as they showed little or no boundaries around him, ( hence the easy  “pussy  grabbing” which he could do ) Madonna’s statement is far more serious in my view.

Now that she is a 60 year old woman, one cannot overlook why she made this statement. If it is for effect – for the shock of it all,then her judgement is very poor. Part of having poor judgement is one of the major symptoms of those with Alzheimer’s Disease.  They may do things behavior wise that are socially inappropriate like suddenly getting naked in public, causing a public commotion, or having a temper meltdown, among many other abberant actions.

Memory  issues and suddenly making inappropriate or shocking statements are also other symptoms of the disorder.Even those Madonna had made many shocking and inappropriate  statements in the past, the fact that this is one of the most shocking and inappropriate statements she has ever made, can lead one to question her mental health status as well as her cognitive functioning. 

Who in their right mind would offer up oral sex to anyone who votes for Clinton and then cap it off my saying that they “swallow” the ejaculate?   Her skankiness  which we have just seen, has exacerbated perhaps due to her possible Alzheimer’s  Disease which may be a real  possibility. Even though she was skanky before in her actions and comments, perhaps at  her age  of 60, her actions and skankiness may become ever more pronounced possibly be due to the onset of Alzheimers Disease or  her having full blown Alzheimer’s disease. It cannot be overlooked in my view.

If she does not have Alzheimers and has undergone a complete examination by a physician to determine  that she doesn’t have it, then we see an absolutely pathetic  and desperate  60 year old  woman longing for the limelight that passes her by each day with new, younger and more talented people grabbing the spotlight. If this is her attempt to stay relevant than we must ALL deem her irrelevant and boycott her at all costs.

If she thinks that she is helping Hillary by her  intentional vulgar comments, she may just have help those undecided to vote the other way. They may think that if  this is an example of a Hillary supporter, then they want no part of it.

If Madonna has Alzheimers she needs to hang it up- her dancing shoes , costumes, and the microphone  immediately !  She needs to get out of the limelight and go out in whatever grace or dignity she has left so she doesn’t end up embarrassing herself.  If she is doing it for PR or for affect or shock value  then she needs to be boycotted as well. What decent mother would allow her daughter  or son to see a Madonna concert knowing that as a woman she speaks like she did. She is no role model and she is no entertainer. She is a nothing more than a vulgar skank. and her behavior should not be tolerated.

Yes she has been a controversial figure for years. But there is one thing when one is controversial and another thing when one has crossed the line to show  disrespect a Presidential candidate and offer to suck  any one who votes’ for Hillary’s genitals and have that person ejaculate in her mouth  as she states she will swallow their ejaculate.

Mind you that I am  certainly no prude and have I  heard it all throughout my life. Very little surprises me or shocks me. But Madonna’s recent actions not only repulses me as a human being but especially repulses me as a woman.Women have worked so hard to crack that glass ceiling and to get equal pay and equal recognition. For her to make such a vular  a statement  and associate it with what she would do to prostitute herself out to help the cause of another woman who by the way dedicated her life to cracking that glass ceiling is despicable.

If she has Alzheimers he must be boycotted so we don’t contribute to her further embarrassing herself. And of she is doing it for shock value and effect she must be  boycotted and not be given media time and held completely accountable for her Toxic Skanky Behavior.

Former Miss Universe Shows Signals of Deception regarding “Miss Piggy and Miss Housekeeping” Trump Accusation

screen-shot-2016-09-28-at-9-56-28-am

Putting politics aside or how you may feel about Donald Trump, the specific accusation that the former Miss Universe  Alicia Machado, who gained 60 pounds, made about Donald Trump calling her “Miss Piggy and “Miss  Housekeeping” shows multiple signs of deception from looking away, to incongruous head movement in relation to speech, to duping delight, to specific speech tells indicative of deception.

In analyzing the Inside Edition video, where she speaks to my dear friend Jim Moret, whom I have known ever since we began our careers as reporters at the ABC affiliate in Los Angeles-KABC TV, I have seen many signs of deception as she reports that Trump called her “Miss Piggy” and “Miss Housekeeping”. Continue reading

U of Iowa Mascot’s Angry Facial Expression ‘Traumatizing’ Students- Is Barney A Better Choice for These Big Babies?

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 4.12.33 PM

 

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 2.45.43 PM.pngScreen Shot 2016-09-02 at 2.46.05 PM.png

When actor Clint Eastwood recently called the new generation a “Pussy Generation”-a  generation of weaklings with no backbone, who are easily offended, he may have been right on target, especially with what recently happened at the University of Iowa.

Apparently, the U of Iowa has a school mascot named Herky the Hawk, a cartoonish gold and black figure. The Hawk has an angry, aggressive  look, complete with furrowed forehead. This depiction is to reflect the fighting spirit during university sports games.

Apparently, a University of Iowa professor has requested that the U of Iowa athletics department change Herky the Hawk’s facial expression and make him look friendlier because the character’s current  facial expression is apparently traumatizing students.

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 4.38.55 PM.png

Resmiye Oral,  seen in the photo above, a clinical professor of pediatrics, apparently wrote  an email to the athletic department officials as well as to the U of Iowa Faculty Senate  where she stated,  “I believe incoming students should be met with welcoming, nurturing, calm, accepting and happy messages.”

“And our campus community is doing a great job in that regard when it comes to words. However, Herky’s angry, to say the least, faces conveying an invitation to aggressivity and even violence are not compatible with the verbal messages that we try to convey to and instill in our students and campus community,” she argued.

This Toxic professor in my view also told the Iowa Press- Citizen newspaper that she has been concerned for some time about Herky the Hawk’s lack of emotional diversity as she further stated ” “As we strive to tackle depression, suicide, violence, and behavioral challenges and help our students succeed, I plead with you to allow Herky to be like one of us, sometimes sad, sometimes happy, sometimes angry, sometimes concentrated.

In my view professor Oral needs to put her efforts on doing some meaningful research in her field instead of worrying about Herkey. Herkey has been around for generations and as not caused any lasting damage to any student’s psyche.

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 2.46.05 PM

If these big babies  with such tender psyche’s at the U of  Iowa can’t handle angry Herkey, perhaps they would be best suited to have another character as their mascot-purple “Barney” the dinosaur , who also happens to be a  huge hit with toddlers.

This is frightening to think that students cannot handle a cartoon mascot’s  angry facial expression. If it is  violence,  Professor Oral is concerned about, then she needs to not focus on the mascot,  but  rather, on the game of football. Will her next email missive be to banish the violent sport of football at the U of Iowa?  Does she believe football is too violent for student’s psyche’s and for their tender eyes to see?

And what about other sports? This can go very far if it is not stopped. Apparently officials with the U of Iowa  Faculty Senate told the  Iowa Press-Citizen that they are currently tackling the larger issue of ensuring that the university climate is one that is “safe and inclusive.”

Well here is the reality of life, U of Iowa students and any other student at any other university, as well as any faculty member who has been hiding behind the walls of the ivory tower of academia for so long,  they no longer have a clue as to how the real world operates and functions.

The world’s climate is NOT ” safe and inclusive” and that is the reality of life.  What better way to learn this message than at a university. At a university, you will have a glimpse of what life is really like, so that you can be better prepared to handle any of life’s annoyances and disappointments which you, like everyone else, will surely experience.

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 4.37.43 PM.png

In the university setting, not every student will get an award, a scholarship,  or be invited to join a sorority or a fraternity. A boy or a girl that you fancy may not be attracted  to you. In fact, they may ignore you. If you end up dating them, they may cheat on you, or  ghost you- dropping you like a hot potato for a reason unknown to you.  Not all students will make good grades and some will even flunk out. Some will be given grades that they deem unfair, while others will not be allowed to play on any one of the university’s sports teams. Some will  have to drop out because of financial  or family concerns. Others will excel in school and be admitted to grad schools, law, vet, or medical schools, while still others, will be admitted nowhere. Some will get excellent grades and even graduate with honors, only to find they can’t find a job and have to work in a department store as a sales clerk, summa or magna cum laude or not. Such is life. Life is full of ups and downs and it is not fair. Life is not “fair and inclusive.” Any university that gives students the illusion that it is, is not doing their job  in preparing students to survive in the real world.

In the real world, there are lots of people with lots of opinions. Some opinions will be similar  to yours, while other’s opinions will be the complete opposite. Just because someone has a different philosophical, religious, or political view, you need to respect that they are entitled to their opinion. Like any mature adult you need to learn to “agree to disagree”. You don’t need to kick them out of your life, avoid them, resent, hate them or find a “safe place” to run away from them.

In the real world, some people won’t like you for no reason at all. Other’s won’t like you because of where you are from, your family background, the color of your skin,  your personality, the color of your hair, how you look,  how much or  how little money you have, how successful or unsuccessful you are,  or how attractive or unattractive you are. Like it or not, that is the reality of life.

What you learned in the first grade -that everyone has to like everyone and get along is what your first grade and subsequent school teachers told you because they didn’t want to deal with a classroom of chaos and fighting children. But the truth is that in the real world,  you will NOT like everyone and not everyone will like you and that is OK. Some people will be Toxic to you and you will be Toxic to others. That is a reality of life, not only for  for human beings, but for animals as well.

Screen Shot 2016-08-22 at 2.40.22 PM.png

When I am at the park with my goldendoodle Annabella, even though she likes most dogs, there are some  dogs, she simply  doesn’t care for. She is not playful or friendly to them, like she is to others. It is her animal instinct kicking in that tells her who is friend or foe. The same is true for us humans. Our instincts also tell us who is Toxic, who to like, and who not to like.

And here is a “newsflash” for the real world:  THERE ARE NO SAFE PLACES! If someone offends you with their ideas and beliefs – (and they will), get over it!  Move on. Don’t sulk and brood and cry. Mommy and daddy, may have provided a safe physical and emotional haven for you at home. But in real life,  there are no safe havens. Maybe you got an award for just showing  up at a team sports game when you were younger. Maybe your parents helped you with your homework or may have even done it for you. If you had trouble with a classmate, friend, or teacher, perhaps they were there to fight your battles. But in the real world you can no longer rely on your” helicopter parents.”

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 3.26.55 PM.png

When I read that  students said they “didn’t feel “safe”at one of  the most prestigious universities in the south, Emory University in Georgia  simply because someone wrote the word TRUMP on the sidewalk, I was appalled. They clamored that they were “in pain” over this. Well if writing the name of a political candidate  in chalk brings you pain, then you will have a very miserable and painful life.

Students at Emory University, claimed that  writing ‘Trump 2016′ on Sidewalk Is a Racist Microaggression …,” with references to students needing “trigger warnings” and “safe spaces” to protect them from presidential candidates’ names and slogans. For many, it was another sign of college students being so overly sensitive, that even political campaigning could be seen as hate speech.

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 4.40.50 PM.png

Well, college students, get over your being overly sensitive. There are two major political parties in this country. While you may prefer one candidate, there are others out there who may prefer the other candidate. If someone supports a candidate you don’t like, they are  not  committing a hate crime. Conversely, if you support a candidate someone else, likes, you are not committing a hate crime.

So whether it is dealing with an angry looking school mascot, who has harmlessly been around for decades,  or having a difference of  political opinion from someone else, grow up and stop acting like a toddler- hiding in a safe place like mommy’s skirt or in a special room.

Not everything will make you feel comfortable in life.  So deal with it! That is what grown ups, not babies, do in the real world.