As you know by now I cannot stand SPIN, fakeness, phoniness, lies and manipulation. I hate it when people think that the public is dumb and will buy any story put in front of them.
As someone with no political agenda I am able to see things objectively and clearly . So no matter who the candidate is, I don’t like what is being done to them. That is the case with candidate Herman Cain and his latest accuser Sharon Bialeck. Her accusations were made at the side of strong Demoratic supporter Gloria Allred, who made sure she stood breast to breast with Sharon, to insure she got into every photo op shot of the two of them together.
So what is wrong with this picture (besides the fact Gloria Allred is in it)? What is wrong with the picture is that
- Bialek’s body language , speech and voice scream multiple signals of deception and
- her story makes NO sense whatsoever as she inadvertently ends up painting herself as the aggressor and not the victim
BIALEKS’ BODY SAYS OF TELLS OF DECEPTION
Body language wise, as I watched her over the top recitation at the presser, it wasobvious to me that she was most likely in my view making this stuff up. If she is telling some truth then she is disgruntled because
- she hit Cain up for a job when she was fired and he didn’t come through for her,
- and or someone put her up to this (like perhaps Gloria Allred who may possibly have solicited her as a client) ,
- and or she is desperate for her 15 minutes of fame in hopes that it will help her career.
The fact that this allegedly happened 14 years ago is suspect in itself . Why did she not come forward then? And don’t tell me she is a victim of sexual harassment who suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.
She didn’t look much like she had PTSS when she smiled and showed the most incongruent elated facial expression at the end of her speech as she implored Cain to make things right. Then she gives a political speech about the times we are in and the leaders we need. People with PTTS don’t talk like that. There is clearly an agenda here in my view.
Look at Gloria, who can’t even look at her client. In fact, she doesn’t look at Bialeck throughout the whole presser. Allred clearly knows the drill and has obviously orchestrated all of this public zoo like drama as looks down making sure Sharon is following the script she most likely wrote for her.
Bialeck Initiates and Instigates By Flirting and Flattering Cain
Bialeck begins by saying how she met Cain and how he sat next to her at the National Restaurant Association convention . She slips up by saying’ During the conversation” and then corrects her self by saying “ the convention “ rather. When someone stumbles like this it is usually a signal of deception. She is reading words which are not heartfelt and most likely not from her directly.
Then she relays she thought that Cain was an inspirational speaker. She said to him “When are you running for President?” As she relays this, she shakes her head “No “ and purses her lips and looks down which most likely means that she did not say that. So there is another signal of deception here.
If this occurred 14 years ago as she said, the thought of a Black man running for President was not even a consideration as it is now. So that means if it did happen she was merely flattering him, toying, and flirting with him becuase she knew quite well that during those days, a decade and a half ago, a considering a Black man for President was not a reality.
She then says he invited her and her boyfriend to attend an exclusive party and says she felt “honored to be included.” That means she didn’t deserve to be included and knew deep down she didn’t belong there, but felt grateful she could attend. Also the use of the word honored means that she allegedly held Cain in high esteem.
Fired From Her Organization, Allegedly Manipulates Head of Organization , Cain To Get Her Job Back
Then she said she was let go (FIRED) by the Foundation and was devastated. WHY was she let go? That is the burning question. She said she was devastated. Why was she devastated ?
She then puts blame on the organization by stating that she felt she was doing well in the short time she was there in terms of fundraising. Well maybe her definition of well and her bosses deinition of “doing well “well were two different things.
As she describes her personal story of being” let go” FIRED , there is a marked difference in her delivery. She is fluid and fluent and isn’t reading from the script. So it rings true she was indeed fired and that she was indeed upset by it.
Allegedly her “boyfriend” said for her to reach out to Cain, as she, he said Herman seems to think kindly of you. WHY would he think so kindly of her after sitting next to her at dinner for a few moments? Is it because she was flirting and flattering him to death. Most likely.! It’s called kissing up to the head of the organization- the boss.
She said she called Cain and he took her call and she told him she was let go and he said he was not aware if it. Don’t you think that if the head of the organization heard their employee was let go, they would want to know WHY that person was let go?
Don’t you think that after he found out what she allegedly did, he would want nothing to do with her? Cain was a political person back then, so why would he make waves in the politics of his own organization and re hire a fired person? It does not make sense. Also it is suspect to me to call someone for a job and just happen tell them the name of the hotel you are staying at.
SHE Instigated The Alleged Meeting- NOT Cain And Shows Many Signals of Deception.
SHE then explains since she was unemployed, her boyfriend booked a room for her at the capital Hilton. Isn’t that a bit piggy of her? If you are unemployed and have no money and someone else pays for you to stay at the most expensive hotel in DC, wouldn’t you let them know you couldn’t accept it because it was too pricey and
Relaying to the public that she took the room so freely sounds like she feels entitled to it and smacks of a “gimmie gimmie “gold digging” mentality
She asked where they should meet, another aggressive act. She relays he said they meet at the hotel lobby bar. This means that he was not having hanky panky or ulterior motives on his mind as he allegedly suggested an open public place.
When she discusses the suite that she was arranged by Cain she shows deception as she explains that she thought it was her boyfriend trying to surpsise her That is too much information and indicative of deception.
Body language wise she he looks down and lip purses, further indicating signals of deception.’
Being in the restaurant hotel business, herself, she could have finagled an upgrade all by herself. What would be the motivation of a man whom you met once upgrading you when he allegedly doesn’t know what you want or why you are coming to see him.
She says he took her to dinner and he promptly said WHY ARE YOU HERE? Isn’t that odd that someone would ask you why you are there when you yourself set up an appointment to meet them and they meet you for a drink? Also if HE asked why she was there, it indicates that he did not have any ulterior motive with her. He had no idea what she wanted from him.
Thus, we have seen yet another aggressive pattern by Bialeck. Did she finagle him to buy her a dinner saying how hungry she was? Did she flatter and flirt. Was she flattering and flirting so much at dinner that he had to say WHY ATRE YOU HERE ? Was he thinking, what in goodness sakes do you want from me? Are you a hooker or something?
If she wanted a job all she had to do was call his office, meet with him in his office and ask him for a job in his office. The operative word here is office .Done and completed! But her drink and dinner BS may have been leading him on to make him question her as to why she was really there.
HARRASSMENT SCENARIO MAKES NO SENSE AND SHOWS MANY SIGNALS OF DECEPTION
Then she says she asks him to help her get her old job back or get a job in a different department as she allegedly hits him up for a job.
So did he say, yes or no or maybe? The fact that she doesn’t relay what he said is suspect in itself.
She then reports he allegedly takes her in his car and drives her to the National Restaurant Association and sexually harasses her WHAT ??????????
If he allegedly upgraded her to a suite as she said earlier, don’t you think he would harass her in her upgraded suite he allegedly secured and NOT in a car.
She described what she wore and said he had a suit with his shirt open. WHAT??? What happened to his tie? And why was his shirt open? Did did she open it? Was she flattering and flirting and unbuttoning his shirt? This sounds like BS to me. If a man is interested in having sex with you, he di going to unbutton his PANTS not his SHIRT? And did he do this when he was driving her around DC when they were stopped at traffic lights ?
She does NOT say he parked in front of such and such building and attacked me. This is nonsense.
This most likely NEVER happened as she stutters on her words while she relates he had with his shirt with his shirt open ,, When people repeat significant words they are usually lying .
She looks down as she said he was going to show me around the offices . She touches her nose just like she did in the above photo when discussing the hotel drinks they most likely did NOT have. Look at Gloria flowing the script along with her client.
As Bialek describes what she wore , she interjected UM’s ( a huge signal of deception. As she said instead of going in the office he reached over and….. she SWALLOWS HARD- another huge signal of deception . As she says that he reached over and he put his hand on my leg , she has a shoulder shrug which screams LIE!
Also as she discusses how they met for a drink, she covers up her mouth as you can see in the photo. That is a signal of deception. Cain claims he never met the woman, let alone met her for a drink. Her tell certainly may indicate this.
Also her response to Cain’s allegedly putting her hand up his crotch sounds bogus.
She asks him “What are you Doing ? You know I have a boyfriend? WHAT???????? Does that mean if she didn’t have a boyfriend it would be fine to touch her crotch? Her response sounds very off. One would say STOP, DON’T , NO! One would not give the reason to not continue as to their having a boyfriend. It makes no sense .
She also showed no anger or upset as she relayed this moment and in essence relived it. That is another HUGE signal of deception.
She said she told her “boyfriend” and a mentor and that she was embarrassed. Of course she didn’t tell them the details because nothing probably happened because she told them nothing. If something sexually inappropriate really happened and your alleged boyfriend was the one who supposedly suggested you set up the meeting, don’t you think you would tell him everything? And who is this “boyfriend”?
Then she leaks out the above facial expression which is inconsistent with what she is saying. Her eyes needed to be open wide and eyebrows raised as she spoke of ‘surprise”. Instead she makes a closed off disgusted look with head cocked to the side which is another huge signal of deception. Also she minimizes what she says by saying “kind of normal”.
Bialeck Beams and Smiles At Her ALLEGED “Harasser” 14 Years Later?
Her face literally lights up whens he said she saw him again. She said in an upbeat voice as she said you remember me? He obviously didn’t remember her among the hundreds of thousands he has met over the past 14 years.
As she describes his speech, he says as he spoke he had the same infectious presence when she first heard him. She lights up and beams a huge smile as she says this. Here is a HUGE clue of deception in my book. When you have been sexually harassed by someone, he last thing you do is flatter them publically or even go to see them.
The last thing you would do is light up and beam a smile. Instead your brow would furrow and you would have a look of disgust and anger on your face. Bialeck had a beaming smile instead.
Does This Smack of A Political Agenda or Setup?
She said that when she asked if he remembered her, she wanted him to come clean for HIS SAKE AND FOR HIS CANDIDACY When someone is harassed they are not thinking of the other person’s sake or their candidacy. She also self corrects which is another signal of deception.
Then she gives some altrusitc BS by saying she is the face and voice behind women who are afraid to come forward voice. Puhleeeze!!!!!! Now I am convinced that this must have been written by by Gloria or her minions as the rhetoric sounds way too familiar. It sounds like what many of her other clients have all said in their pressers as she sttod breast to breast with them in front of the microphones.
When she starts her final statement with a political message of how America is in turmoil and what kind of leader we need, I am even more convinced someone put her up to this. If you are harassed you are not thinking about your country in turmoil. She also smiled as she said this. This is incongruent behavior with someone who was harassed.
In the above photo she scratches her face and looks down at significant points in the speech. This usually indicates deception.
She claims it happened 14 years ago . Why come out NOW when he is running for office? It is because she and those who most like likely wrote this speech want to smear up his candidacy.
Based on her body language, voice and speech tells this is NO shrinking violet. She seems like a strong willed aggressive woman who speaks her mind. She is no shrinking violet or some little victim.
On the contrary, she is a woman who LOVE, LOVES, LOVES the media attention!!! She was beaming on all the morning talk shows
In these above photos this look like a sexually harassed woman who was traumatized by what Cain did to her 14 years ago. To me she is the voice and face of someone who finally got her 15 minutes of fame or infamy. www.drlillianglass.com